devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Maxime Ripard
	<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert to the new i2c compatibles
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:44:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214074407.GA2569@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140213225248.GB15350@lukather>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 670 bytes --]


> > For non-a10, That should be at least
> > 
> > 	compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c";
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > 	compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-i2c";
> > 
> > depending on the outcome above.
> > 
> > Or is my knowledge outdated already?
> > 
> 
> Since they are strictly compatible, we don't need to introduce any
> different compatible string here.

You never know all errata in advance. From what I know, one should
always use the specfic naming first, and then the generic fallback. So,
in case a distinction is needed later (think errata), then one doesn't
need to change the devicetrees.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-14  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1391680285-16668-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
     [not found] ` <1391680285-16668-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
     [not found]   ` <1391680285-16668-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-13  8:26     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert to the new i2c compatibles Wolfram Sang
2014-02-13 22:52       ` Maxime Ripard
2014-02-14  7:44         ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-02-14 20:36           ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140214074407.GA2569@katana \
    --to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).