From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 3/3] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:34:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20140217163421.GD20125@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1392128273-8614-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <1392128273-8614-4-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <20140216013956.GV4451@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140216013956.GV4451@sirena.org.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Mike Turquette , Tomasz Figa , Mark Hambleton , Russell King , Nicolas Pitre , Daniel Lezcano , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Dave P Martin , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kevin Hilman , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , Vincent Guittot , Antti Miettinen , Peter De Schrijver , Stephen Boyd , Amit List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:39:56AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: [...] > > + - cache-state-retained > > + Usage: See definition > > + Value type: > > + Definition: if present cache memory is retained on power down, > > + otherwise it is lost. > > Might be better to define which caches? I do not expect caches in the same power domain to have different retention capabilities, so a flag per-state should be enough. If anyone is unhappy about this please flag it up. List of caches affected can be retrieved by walking the power-domain specifiers and check those against the caches power domains. Thanks, Lorenzo