From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: Kirkwood: Fix qnap vendor prefix Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:10:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20140219171045.GC25079@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1392814154-11284-1-git-send-email-klightspeed@killerwolves.net> <1392814154-11284-5-git-send-email-klightspeed@killerwolves.net> <20140219130553.GO17984@lunn.ch> <5304AE28.6030209@killerwolves.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5304AE28.6030209@killerwolves.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Peddell Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Anton Vorontsov , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , David Woodhouse , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:14:16PM +0000, Ben Peddell wrote: > On 19/02/14 23:05, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/qnap-poweroff.c b/drivers/power/reset/qnap-poweroff.c > >> index a75db7f..d350ece 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/power/reset/qnap-poweroff.c > >> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/qnap-poweroff.c > >> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static const struct power_off_cfg synology_power_off_cfg = { > >> }; > >> > >> static const struct of_device_id qnap_power_off_of_match_table[] = { > >> - { .compatible = "qnap,power-off", > >> + { .compatible = "qnapsz,power-off", > >> .data = &qnap_power_off_cfg, > >> }, > > > > Hi Ben > > > > This causes issues for devices using old DT blobs. You need to keep > > the old entry as well as supporting the new vendor prefix. > > > > We need to consider, is it worth the hassle of changing the prefix, > > since it has been in use for a long time. I think using the stock > > ticker is a "rule of thumb" and not a strict requirement. > > So, in this case it would be best to change qnapsz back to qnap in > patch #1, and completely remove this patch? If we already have users of the qnap prefix, yes please. Thanks, Mark.