From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] ahci_platform: drop support for a bunch of obsolete platform device types Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:13:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20140222221336.GA19590@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1393086175-6383-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <1393086175-6383-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Disposition: inline To: Hans de Goede Cc: Marek Vasut , Maxime Ripard , Oliver Schinagl , Richard Zhu , Roger Quadros , Lee Jones , linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:22:52PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Tejun, Marek, > > This series, which is to be applied on top of my ahci_platform restructering > series, mostly speaks for itself. > > I've some doubts about the 2nd patch, which removes the imx53-ahci platform > device support from ahci_platform.c. I'm pretty sure this is obsolete and > replaced by Marek's ahci_imx.c work, but not 100%, which is why this series > is marked as RFC. Marek can you confirm that the code the 2nd patch removes > is inded dead code? > > Tejun, if Marek confirms this is indeed dead code feel free to apply this > despite the RFC marking. Applied 1-3 to libata/for-3.15. Thanks. -- tejun