From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v8.1 1/6] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:16:23 +0100 Message-ID: <201402272016.23521.arnd@arndb.de> References: <21117503.1c6iOkvYSr@phil> <201402251419.31151.arnd@arndb.de> <2574291.evU61mFTUd@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2574291.evU61mFTUd@phil> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Sachin Kamat , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , Grant Likely , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being p= art > of the peripheral, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the s= ram. > = > Therefore add the option to define reserved regions as subnodes of the > sram-node similar to defining reserved global memory regions. > = > Originally > Suggested-by: Rob Herring > = > Using subnodes for reserved regions > Suggested-by: Grant Likely > = > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann