From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: ks.giri@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/s3c64xx: Update DT binding documentation to match code
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:19:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140307091908.GJ8570@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140307024841.GV13126@sirena.org.uk>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:05:39PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > The following patch added support for spi controllers with a dedicated
> > chip select pin:
> >
> > commit 3146beec21b64f4551fcf0ac148381d54dc41b1b
> > spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin
> >
> > It updated the device tree binding to require a "cs-gpio" property to be
> > specified on the spi controller node if chip selects will be given as
> > GPIOs per slave, rather than the controller having a dedicated internal
> > chip select pin.
>
> No, it doesn't - it's saying that if the device has a "cs-gpio" property
> then to use that as the chip select. It's not a boolean, it's a GPIO
> specifier. Looking at the code it looks like the intention is to search
> all children for a cs-gpio during the controller probe, it's possible
> that this isn't working correctly.
That is basically part of my question is the current setup doing
what it is intended to? The Samsung binding has controller-data
blocks on each of the slaves that specify the gpio for that
slave.
@@ -1326,7 +1340,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
sdd->cntrlr_info = sci;
sdd->pdev = pdev;
sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start;
+ sdd->cs_gpio = true;
if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+ if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL))
+ sdd->cs_gpio = false;
This part of the original patch adds the check, I guess the
mistake could be an assumption that of_find_property will
recursively check all the children, which it won't. This will
just check the controller node itself for a cs-gpio property but
as these are specified within sub-nodes they won't be found.
Hence currently you need to add one at the controller level.
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-06 17:05 [PATCH] spi/s3c64xx: Update DT binding documentation to match code Charles Keepax
[not found] ` <1394125539-28062-1-git-send-email-ckeepax-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-07 2:48 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-07 9:19 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
[not found] ` <20140307091908.GJ8570-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-09 8:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140307091908.GJ8570@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ks.giri@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).