From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: input: keyboard: st-keyscan: add keyscan driver Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:35:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20140310163557.GJ13661@lee--X1> References: <1393990772-9567-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1393990772-9567-2-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20140310114819.GO14976@lee--X1> <20140310152859.GA29054@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20140310153815.GE13661@lee--X1> <20140310155824.GB29054@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140310155824.GB29054@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Gabriel FERNANDEZ , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Landley , Russell King , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, Giuseppe Condorelli List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > > > This patch adds ST Keyscan driver to use the keypad hw a subs= et > > > > > of ST boards provide. Specific board setup will be put in the > > > > > given dt. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez > > > >=20 > > > > Are you sure these are in the correct order? > > > >=20 > > > > What is the history of this commit? > > > >=20 > > > > > --- > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/input/st-keypad.txt | 50 +++= + > > > >=20 > > > > This should be submitted as a seperate patch. > > >=20 > > > Why do we have such requirement? To me it would make more sense t= o add > > > binding documentation in the same commit as the code that uses th= ese > > > bindings. > >=20 > > I'm inclined to agree with you and that's actually how we used to d= o > > it, but a decision was made by the DT guys at one of the Kernel > > Summits to submit Documentation as a separate patch. >=20 > Do you have background for this decision? To me it is akin splitting > header file into a separate patch. The discussion/decision was verbal unfortunately. I don't really mind either way. I'm just attempting to enforce the decisions that were made by the forces-that-be. Perhaps ping devicetree@vger.kernel.org with me in CC for more clarification if required. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html