From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu driver Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20140311224517.GA5672@lee--X1> References: <1394552775-31264-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <1394552775-31264-3-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <20140311160837.GP21216@lee--X1> <20140311221938.GO25092@beef> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140311221938.GO25092@beef> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Porter Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Christian Daudt , Devicetree List , Linux ARM Kernel List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > Add a driver for the BCM590xx PMU multi-function devices. The dri= ver > > > initially supports regmap initialization and instantiation of the > > > voltage regulator device function of the PMU. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter > > > Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger > > > Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 8 ++++ > > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h | 31 +++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 133 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h > >=20 > > I have a tiny nit that 'ret' doesn't need to be initialised before > > use in probe(), but apart from that... > >=20 > > Looks pretty sensible: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones >=20 > Ok, thanks. When I get back in front of my desktop I'll send a v4 of > just this patch to address that nit. Mark already applied the regulat= or > driver from this series, will you be taking this through your tree? F= or > that matter, I wonder if the binding would also go through your tree > with this driver. At least the MFD portion and the DT binding doc will go through the MFD tree. Are there any inter-patch dependencies in the set? If so, we should know about them so we can coordinate a sensible solution. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog