From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Schwebel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Move device tree graph parsing helpers to drivers/of Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:05:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20140314070505.GV1629@pengutronix.de> References: <1394126000.3622.66.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140307182330.75168C40AE3@trevor.secretlab.ca> <20140310102630.3cb1bcd7@samsung.com> <20140310143758.3734FC405FA@trevor.secretlab.ca> <1394708896.3577.21.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140313113527.GM21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5321CB04.6090700@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5321CB04.6090700@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki , Russell King - ARM Linux , Philipp Zabel , Greg KH , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tomi Valkeinen , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Rob Herring , Laurent Pinchart , Kyungmin Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:13:08PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > My experience and feelings are similar, I started to treat mainline > kernel much less seriously after similar DT related blocking issues. So how do we proceed now? Philipp implemented any of the suggested variants now; nevertheless, there doesn't seem to be a consensus. However, we really need a decision of the oftree maintainers. I think we are fine with almost any of the available variants, as long as there is a decision. It would be great if we could soon continue to address the technical issues with the IPU, instead of turning around oftree bindings. There is really enough complexity left :-) rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |