From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] ARM: at91: introduce OLD_IRQ_AT91 Kconfig option Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:06:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20140329100639.5ea454bc@skate> References: <1396029548-10928-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> <1396029548-10928-4-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1396029548-10928-4-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Boris BREZILLON Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley , Thomas Gleixner , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Boris BREZILLON, On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:59:01 +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > +config OLD_IRQ_AT91 > + bool > + default false I don't think "default false" is a valid Kconfig construct. It could be "default n", but that's useless since "default n" is the default behavior. So I believe you can simply get rid of that line. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com