From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: add support for the Armada 38x SDHCI controller Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:48:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20140329174811.53929a5e@skate> References: <1392736109-3981-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140329161440.2c39440f@skate> <86k3bdugdz.fsf@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <86k3bdugdz.fsf@void.printf.net> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Ezequiel Garcia , Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk , Marcin Wojtas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Device Tree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Chris Ball, On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:19:20 +0000, Chris Ball wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29 2014, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > The below patch was originally sent on February, 18th. On February > > 25th, I sent a reply to get some news. Then, again on March, 20th, I > > sent again a reply to get some news. I have never heard back from you > > about this patch since a month and a half. The patch is fairly simple, > > and not having it merged prevents from enabling SDHCI on a new platform > > we're working. > > I'm sorry about this. I didn't see either of your previous pings -- > they were both marked as spam by SpamAssassin due to a failing > RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP test. That test is supposed to signify that there is > an invalid IP in a Received: header, but I don't see such an IP, so > I'm suspecting it might be a SpamAssassin bug. It looks like between > the first two pings and this one, free-electrons.com moved from > Hetzner to OVH, and that stopped the test failing. Just letting you > know in case it's widespread. I should try upgrading SpamAssassin. > > (Still, I should have noticed your pings on the list too.) Ah, sorry. I'll notify the person who handles our mail server about this. > > Could you consider applying the patch for 3.15, or at least, give some > > review comments if any? > > Yes, looks good, pushed to mmc-next for 3.15, thanks. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com