From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org"
<linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: topology: Make it clear that all CPUs need to be described
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:30:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140331093046.GA2245@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396016467-23257-1-git-send-email-broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:21:07PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>
> The ARMv8 code will reject topologies that omit some CPUs (and it's not
> clear that it's ever sensible to do so). Update the binding document to
> make this clear.
>
> Since we're reformatting the text also fix incorrect grammar in the
> final "Any other configuration..." section by removing "consider".
I think the commit log should be reworded, we update the bindings
because they are incomplete, not because ARMv8 code decided to reject
topologies that omit CPUs.
Patch is ok with me, thanks:
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> index 4aa20e7..1061faf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
> @@ -75,9 +75,10 @@ The cpu-map node can only contain three types of child nodes:
>
> whose bindings are described in paragraph 3.
>
> -The nodes describing the CPU topology (cluster/core/thread) can only be
> -defined within the cpu-map node.
> -Any other configuration is consider invalid and therefore must be ignored.
> +The nodes describing the CPU topology (cluster/core/thread) can only
> +be defined within the cpu-map node and every core/thread in the system
> +must be defined within the topology. Any other configuration is
> +invalid and therefore must be ignored.
>
> ===========================================
> 2.1 - cpu-map child nodes naming convention
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 14:21 [PATCH] ARM: topology: Make it clear that all CPUs need to be described Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1396016467-23257-1-git-send-email-broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-31 9:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
[not found] ` <20140331093046.GA2245-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 23:01 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLj56d6Mb5Vjd4UnBvQ6myAc4j3moY+3EM9zgHxrNgHbw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 23:18 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140410231808.GJ6518-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-11 0:24 ` Rob Herring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-20 12:59 Mark Brown
2014-03-21 13:32 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20140321133202.GQ23372-NuALmloUBlrZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-21 13:39 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140331093046.GA2245@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).