Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt: platform driver: Fill the resources before probe and defer if needed

[Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

* Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> [140421 06:47]:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org> [140418 16:04]:
> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 02:58:48PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> > Oh come on, let's stop pretending it's not broken. And it's way worse with
> >> > device tree as there's nothing making sure the resources for a driver
> >> > are set up before the driver probes. And we've been unable to fix just
> >> > this issue alone for about six months now. It's also broken beyond that.
> >> > It's called of_platform_bus yet it won't even pass the platform_data
> >> > as auxdata to the devices on a sub-bus instantatiated like I2C.
> >>
> >> Isn't there a much simpler solution to the platform device IRQ problem?
> >>
> >> Rather than trying to fix it at the point where the resources are
> >> created, why not just *not* have DT create the IRQ resources in the
> >> first place, and instead have platform_get_irq() (which is the function
> >> which should be used to get an IRQ) be the actor to do whatever is
> >> necessary to return the IRQ(s) ?
> >
> > Yeah why not. I don't see why we would need to do all this of_* special
> > trickery for much anything beyond parsing the binding.
> 
> That can work, but it will still need something like
> of_find_irq_domain() to determine whether to return -EPROBE_DEFER or
> not.

Right. Naturally let's do whatever it takes to first fix this issue
in a minimal way first for the -rc cycle so we can do the longer term
changes needed.
 
> You could also go in the other direction and don't create the device
> until the resources can be resolved. Unlike any of the other
> solutions, that would work for amba bus as well although we may never
> have a case where we need this with the amba bus. This would require
> making of_platform_populate be callable multiple times, but there are
> already some other reasons for wanting to do that. Specifically, I
> would like the core code to call of_platform_populate with default
> options and then only platforms with non-default options need a call
> to of_platform_populate.

I like this idea as this would also probably remove the the numerous
dmesg errors we are currently getting for drivers reprobing with
-EPROBE_DEFER.

In the long term we should have platform bus just call a set of
standardized functions implemented by whatever the data source might
be. That way we can limit the use of of_* functions in device drivers
to just parsing of custom bindings in the drivers and use bus specific
functions for everything else.

> >> Yes, I know we have some drivers which use platform_get_resources() with
> >> IORESOURCE_IRQ, but they should really use the right accessor.  And those
> >> who just dereference the resource array directly... get what's coming
> >> (though of course they have to be fixed.)
> >
> > $ git grep IORESOURCE_IRQ drivers/ | grep platform_get_resource | wc -l
> > 179
> 
> Certainly, this is worthwhile clean-up no matter what the solution.

Yeah agreed. But let's also consider the IORESOURCE_IRQ as just another
source for for the bus or driver data in addition to the DT parsed data.
Both sources of data should work just fine with platform_bus even
without cleaning up the drivers.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html