From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antoine =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] pinctrl: berlin: add a pinctrl driver for Marvell Berlin SoCs Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:56:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20140422155602.GA19762@kwain> References: <1397135274-10764-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1397135274-10764-3-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <5347AFF4.3050607@gmail.com> <20140411123737.GA5903@kwain> <5347EF8A.8040600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Alexandre Belloni , zmxu-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, Jisheng Zhang , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Linus, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth > wrote: > > On 04/11/2014 02:37 PM, Antoine T=E9nart wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wr= ote: > >>> On 04/10/2014 03:07 PM, Antoine T=E9nart wrote: >=20 > >>> Having said that, the above assumes that each function is unique > >>> but IIRC the idea of the function table was to group pins/groups > >>> with the same function, e.g. function "gpio", groups 1,7,25,... > >> > >> Most of the functions you can use on the Berlin they will be uniqu= e and > >> would > >> only be used in one group, except for the 'gpio' one. > > > > Yeah, I had a similar discussion about it back then for mvebu. IIRC= , the > > correct answer is: Have a list of functions with groups assigned to= it > > no matter if there is only one group per function (or 40 per functi= on as > > it will be for gpio). > > > > Maybe Linus can give an update on how to deal with it? >=20 > Have you considered implementing pinmux_ops > .gpio_request_enable(), .gpio_set_direction() and > .gpio_disable_free() instead of defining groups for each > and every GPIO? The function 'gpio' can be found on different groups. But the Berlin pi= n muxing does not allow to configure a pin individually. It is then not possible= to mux GPIO pins individually. For example the 'gpio' function of group 'GSM2'= on the BG2Q will mux GPIOs 17 *and* 18. Groups does not have more than a single 'gpio' function. Since the gpio_request_enable() comment says 'Implement this only if yo= u can mux every pin individually as GPIO', I did not considered implementing thes= e functions. Antoine --=20 Antoine T=E9nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html