From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: Handle memory@0 node on PPC32 only Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:35:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20140423103536.GC30036@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1397756521-29387-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <1397756521-29387-4-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <20140418125924.GF5904@bivouac.eciton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring , Lee Jones Cc: Leif Lindholm , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linaro Patches , "linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig > > index 889005f..230c747 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig > > @@ -77,4 +77,7 @@ config OF_RESERVED_MEM > > help > > Helpers to allow for reservation of memory regions > > > > +config OF_MEMORY_AT_0_QUIRK > > + def_bool n > > I do not like this because it would not scale to many quirks. As I > said,, my preference here would be to just add a WARN. I would very much like to be able to remove the quirk entirely for arm64 if possible, which would require more than the addition of a WARN. > The other option is get approval to break compatibility on the ST > platform. It may not be a concern on certain platforms. Lee, would you be able to provide an answer either way so we can get the discussion moving? Cheers, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html