From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] add DT endianness binding support Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 05:43:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20140501034358.GA4514@netboy> References: <1398833029-29546-1-git-send-email-Li.Xiubo@freescale.com> <20140430071011.GA7312@netboy> <20140430182500.GD3245@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140430182500.GD3245@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Xiubo Li , mark.rutland@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mpa@pengutronix.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:25:00AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:10:12AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Shouldn't this go to the arm list and rmk for review, too? > > Is there any particular reason for including rmk? It's generally not > helpful to spam people with serieses without reason, we all get quite a > lot of mail already... I recall seeing him writing at length about cpu/peripheral endianness issues, so I assume he has some expertise here. It would be a shame if a new DT feature were overlooking something important. Thanks, Richard