From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/20] usb: ehci-orion: Add the optional PHY support Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:21:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20140507132150.GA23936@lunn.ch> References: <1399335255-589-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1399335255-589-3-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20140506133341.GE6503@lunn.ch> <20140507114006.466347a0@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140507114006.466347a0@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Andrew Lunn , Gregory CLEMENT , Mathias Nyman , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Felipe Balbi , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:40:06AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Andrew Lunn, > > On Tue, 6 May 2014 15:33:41 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > + priv->phy = devm_phy_get(&pdev->dev, "usb"); > > > + if (!IS_ERR(priv->phy)) { > > > + err = phy_init(priv->phy); > > > + if (err) > > > + goto err2; > > > + > > > + err = phy_power_on(priv->phy); > > > + if (err) > > > + goto err3; > > > + } > > > > Hi Gregory > > > > What about EPROBE_DEFERRED? > > In v4 (to be submitted soon), I've changed this to: > > priv->phy = devm_phy_optional_get(&pdev->dev, "usb"); > if (IS_ERR(priv->phy)) { > err = PTR_ERR(priv->phy); > goto err_phy_get; > } else { > err = phy_init(priv->phy); > if (err) > goto err_phy_init; > > err = phy_power_on(priv->phy); > if (err) > goto err_phy_power_on; > } > > Thanks to devm_phy_optional_get(), the fact of not having a PHY in the > DT is not considered an error. So on any error from > devm_phy_optional_get() (including -EPROBE_DEFER), we simply bail out. > Does this looks good? Hi Thomas That looks good. To avoid the SATA phy problems we had last time, i would like to test this on a few systems. Please could you let me know what branch v4 is in when it is ready. Thanks Andrew