public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "Guido Martínez" <guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why do we assign a unique (and non-deterministic) name in of_device_make_bus_id()
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:32:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140510153227.GA18722@arch.cereza> (raw)

I have a devicetree for a custom board with several nodes with no
applicable reg property, such as:

/ {
	backlight {
		compatible = "pwm-backlight";
	};

	gpio-keys {
		compatible = "gpio-keys";
	};

	rotary-encoder {
		compatible = "rotary-encoder";
	};
};

These nodes are then registered as devices with unique names:

$ ls /sys/devices
gpio_keys.8/	rotary_encoder.9/	backlight.6/

... among others.

The uniqueness is guaranteed by of_device_make_bus_id() which uses a global
counter for all nodes with no reg property. The relevant snippet is:

[..]
/*
 * No BusID, use the node name and add a globally incremented
 * counter (and pray...)
 */
magic = atomic_add_return(1, &bus_no_reg_magic);
dev_set_name(dev, "%s.%d", node->name, magic - 1);

Two nodes can't have the same name and get registered, hence my confusion:
Is the unique number addition absolutely necessary? What am I missing here?

Isn't a bit problematic to register devices with names that depend solely
on probe order (i.e. non-deterministic)?

For instance, hotplug event listeners matching the device name may fail if
the device suddenly change for whatever reason.

Regards,
-- 
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar

                 reply	other threads:[~2014-05-10 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140510153227.GA18722@arch.cereza \
    --to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox