From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: rockchip: convert smp bringup to CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:54:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20140516225422.GA6028@quad.lixom.net> References: <1632873.urGeGsUMPH@diego> <2151573.evmqdkWnet@diego> <1878147.CvhHSZhTas@diego> <155552153.z5UXrbJMBi@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <155552153.z5UXrbJMBi@phil> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Cc: Mark Rutland , "arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Linux ARM Kernel , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:17:46PM +0200, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. M=E4rz 2014, 01:06:32 schrieb Heiko St=FCbner: > > With the newly introduced CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE is not necessary an= ymore > > to reference the relevant smp_ops in the board file, but instead it= can > > simply be set by the enable-method property of the cpu nodes. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner >=20 > more responses to this? [or maybe even an ack :-) ? ] Looks reasonable to me: Acked-by: Olof Johansson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html