From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: bcm590xx: add support for GPLDO and VBUS regulators Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:30:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20140521133038.GJ6679@lee--X1> References: <1398295293-11033-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <1398295293-11033-5-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <20140521092913.GG6679@lee--X1> <20140521120257.GV32082@beef> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140521120257.GV32082@beef> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Porter Cc: Devicetree List , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Tim Kryger , Markus Mayer , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/= bcm59056.dtsi > > > index dfadaaa..066adfb 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm59056.dtsi > > > @@ -70,5 +70,26 @@ > > > =20 > > > vsr_reg: vsr { > > > }; > > > + > > > + gpldo1_reg: gpldo1 { > > > + }; > >=20 > > What do these empty nodes do in any case? >=20 > They instantiate regulators. The bcm590xx binding specifies the > allowable subnode names permitted here. This replaces the old method > of specifying an index or the deprecated regulator-compatible propert= y. > The board-specific dts includes this dtsi and applies any board > constraints to a subset of regulators that need them. Unused regulato= rs > are all disabled which is what we want. >=20 > > Don't you at least need a status property in there or something? >=20 > Not necessary for these subnodes. Very well, thanks for the clarification. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog