[PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tarek Dakhran]

The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC

The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture

Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
tree for Exynos 5410.

Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
  (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)

Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)

I hope this is clean and would be applied.

Tarek.

Tarek Dakhran (3):
  ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC
  clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework
  ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS5410

 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |    1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts          |   82 ++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi                  |  206 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |    5 +
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h                      |   12 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
 9 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h

-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v11 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC

[Tarek Dakhran]

EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
Add initial support for this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig  |    5 +++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h |   12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index 15fa610..d58995c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5260
 	default y
 	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
 
+config SOC_EXYNOS5410
+	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410"
+	default y
+	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
+
 config SOC_EXYNOS5420
 	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420"
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
index 9eb6258..80b90e3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #define EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK	0xFFFE0000
 
 #define EXYNOS5250_SOC_ID	0x43520000
+#define EXYNOS5410_SOC_ID	0xE5410000
 #define EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID	0xE5420000
 #define EXYNOS5440_SOC_ID	0xE5440000
 #define EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID	0xE5422000
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4210, EXYNOS4210_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4212, EXYNOS4212_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4412, EXYNOS4412_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5250, EXYNOS5250_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
+IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5410, EXYNOS5410_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5420, EXYNOS5420_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5440, EXYNOS5440_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
@@ -80,6 +82,12 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 # define soc_is_exynos5250()	0
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)
+# define soc_is_exynos5410()	is_samsung_exynos5410()
+#else
+# define soc_is_exynos5410()	0
+#endif
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)
 # define soc_is_exynos5420()	is_samsung_exynos5420()
 #else
@@ -100,8 +108,8 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos5800, EXYNOS5800_SOC_ID, EXYNOS5_SOC_MASK)
 
 #define soc_is_exynos4() (soc_is_exynos4210() || soc_is_exynos4212() || \
 			  soc_is_exynos4412())
-#define soc_is_exynos5() (soc_is_exynos5250() || soc_is_exynos5420() || \
-			  soc_is_exynos5800())
+#define soc_is_exynos5() (soc_is_exynos5250() || soc_is_exynos5410() || \
+			  soc_is_exynos5420() || soc_is_exynos5800())
 
 void mct_init(void __iomem *base, int irq_g0, int irq_l0, int irq_l1);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

[Tarek Dakhran]

The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.

Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
 4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aeab635
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
+
+The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
+controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
+
+Required Properties:
+
+- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
+
+- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
+  region.
+
+- #clock-cells: should be 1.
+
+All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
+dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
+tree sources.
+
+External clock:
+
+There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
+is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
+with following clock-output-name:
+
+ - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI
+
+Example 1: An example of a clock controller node is listed below.
+
+	clock: clock-controller@0x10010000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-clock";
+		reg = <0x10010000 0x30000>;
+		#clock-cells = <1>;
+	};
+
+Example 2: UART controller node that consumes the clock generated by the clock
+	   controller. Refer to the standard clock bindings for information
+	   about 'clocks' and 'clock-names' property.
+
+	serial@12C20000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
+		reg = <0x12C00000 0x100>;
+		interrupts = <0 51 0>;
+		clocks = <&clock CLK_UART0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART0>;
+		clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
+	};
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 25646c6..69e8177 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS3250)	+= clk-exynos3250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)	+= clk-exynos4.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)	+= clk-exynos5250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)	+= clk-exynos5260.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)	+= clk-exynos5410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)	+= clk-exynos5420.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)	+= clk-exynos5440.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-audss.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9505ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ * Author: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * Common Clock Framework support for Exynos5410 SoC.
+*/
+
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h>
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+
+#include "clk.h"
+
+#define APLL_LOCK               0x0
+#define APLL_CON0               0x100
+#define CPLL_LOCK               0x10020
+#define CPLL_CON0               0x10120
+#define MPLL_LOCK               0x4000
+#define MPLL_CON0               0x4100
+#define BPLL_LOCK               0x20010
+#define BPLL_CON0               0x20110
+#define KPLL_LOCK               0x28000
+#define KPLL_CON0               0x28100
+
+#define SRC_CPU			0x200
+#define DIV_CPU0		0x500
+#define SRC_CPERI1		0x4204
+#define DIV_TOP0		0x10510
+#define DIV_TOP1		0x10514
+#define DIV_FSYS1		0x1054c
+#define DIV_FSYS2		0x10550
+#define DIV_PERIC0		0x10558
+#define SRC_TOP0		0x10210
+#define SRC_TOP1		0x10214
+#define SRC_TOP2		0x10218
+#define SRC_FSYS		0x10244
+#define SRC_PERIC0		0x10250
+#define SRC_MASK_FSYS		0x10340
+#define SRC_MASK_PERIC0		0x10350
+#define GATE_BUS_FSYS0		0x10740
+#define GATE_IP_FSYS		0x10944
+#define GATE_IP_PERIC		0x10950
+#define GATE_IP_PERIS		0x10960
+#define SRC_CDREX		0x20200
+#define SRC_KFC			0x28200
+#define DIV_KFC0		0x28500
+
+/* list of PLLs */
+enum exynos5410_plls {
+	apll, cpll, mpll,
+	bpll, kpll,
+	nr_plls                 /* number of PLLs */
+};
+
+/* list of all parent clocks */
+PNAME(apll_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fout_apll", };
+PNAME(bpll_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fout_bpll", };
+PNAME(cpll_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fout_cpll" };
+PNAME(mpll_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fout_mpll", };
+PNAME(kpll_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fout_kpll", };
+
+PNAME(mout_cpu_p)	= { "mout_apll", "sclk_mpll", };
+PNAME(mout_kfc_p)	= { "mout_kpll", "sclk_mpll", };
+
+PNAME(mpll_user_p)	= { "fin_pll", "sclk_mpll", };
+PNAME(bpll_user_p)	= { "fin_pll", "sclk_bpll", };
+PNAME(mpll_bpll_p)	= { "sclk_mpll_muxed", "sclk_bpll_muxed", };
+
+PNAME(group2_p)		= { "fin_pll", "fin_pll", "none", "none",
+			"none", "none", "sclk_mpll_bpll",
+			 "none", "none", "sclk_cpll" };
+
+static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5410_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
+	MUX(0, "mout_apll", apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
+	MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "mout_kpll", kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1),
+	MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "sclk_mpll", mpll_p, SRC_CPERI1, 8, 1),
+	MUX(0, "sclk_mpll_muxed", mpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 20, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "sclk_bpll", bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
+	MUX(0, "sclk_bpll_muxed", bpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 24, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "sclk_cpll", cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "sclk_mpll_bpll", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP1, 20, 1),
+
+	MUX(0, "mout_mmc0", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 0, 4),
+	MUX(0, "mout_mmc1", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 4, 4),
+	MUX(0, "mout_mmc2", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 8, 4),
+
+	MUX(0, "mout_uart0", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 0, 4),
+	MUX(0, "mout_uart1", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 4, 4),
+	MUX(0, "mout_uart2", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 8, 4),
+
+	MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 12, 1),
+	MUX(0, "mout_aclk400", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 20, 1),
+};
+
+static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5410_div_clks[] __initdata = {
+	DIV(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3),
+	DIV(0, "div_arm2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3),
+
+	DIV(0, "div_acp", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 8, 3),
+	DIV(0, "div_cpud", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 4, 3),
+	DIV(0, "div_atb", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 16, 3),
+	DIV(0, "pclk_dbg", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 20, 3),
+
+	DIV(0, "div_kfc", "mout_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 0, 3),
+	DIV(0, "div_aclk", "div_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 4, 3),
+	DIV(0, "div_pclk", "div_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 20, 3),
+
+	DIV(0, "aclk66_pre", "sclk_mpll_muxed", DIV_TOP1, 24, 3),
+	DIV(0, "aclk66", "aclk66_pre", DIV_TOP0, 0, 3),
+
+	DIV(0, "div_mmc0", "mout_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 0, 4),
+	DIV(0, "div_mmc1", "mout_mmc1", DIV_FSYS1, 16, 4),
+	DIV(0, "div_mmc2", "mout_mmc2", DIV_FSYS2, 0, 4),
+
+	DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0",
+			DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre1", "div_mmc1",
+			DIV_FSYS1, 24, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre2", "div_mmc2",
+			DIV_FSYS2, 8, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+
+	DIV(0, "div_uart0", "mout_uart0", DIV_PERIC0, 0, 4),
+	DIV(0, "div_uart1", "mout_uart1", DIV_PERIC0, 4, 4),
+	DIV(0, "div_uart2", "mout_uart2", DIV_PERIC0, 8, 4),
+	DIV(0, "div_uart3", "mout_uart3", DIV_PERIC0, 12, 4),
+
+	DIV(0, "aclk200", "mout_aclk200", DIV_TOP0, 12, 3),
+	DIV(0, "aclk400", "mout_aclk400", DIV_TOP0, 24, 3),
+};
+
+static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5410_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
+	GATE(CLK_MCT, "mct", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIS, 18, 0, 0),
+
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC0, "sclk_mmc0", "div_mmc_pre0",
+			SRC_MASK_FSYS, 0, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC1, "sclk_mmc1", "div_mmc_pre1",
+			SRC_MASK_FSYS, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC2, "sclk_mmc2", "div_mmc_pre2",
+			SRC_MASK_FSYS, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+
+	GATE(CLK_MMC0, "sdmmc0", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 12, 0, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_MMC1, "sdmmc1", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 13, 0, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_MMC2, "sdmmc2", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 14, 0, 0),
+
+	GATE(CLK_UART0, "uart0", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 0, 0, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_UART1, "uart1", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 1, 0, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_UART2, "uart2", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 2, 0, 0),
+
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART0, "sclk_uart0", "div_uart0",
+			SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 0, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART1, "sclk_uart1", "div_uart1",
+			SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART2, "sclk_uart2", "div_uart2",
+			SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+};
+
+static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5410_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
+	[apll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_APLL, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
+		APLL_CON0, NULL),
+	[cpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_CPLL, "fout_cpll", "fin_pll", CPLL_LOCK,
+		CPLL_CON0, NULL),
+	[mpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_MPLL, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
+		MPLL_CON0, NULL),
+	[bpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_BPLL, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
+		BPLL_CON0, NULL),
+	[kpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_KPLL, "fout_kpll", "fin_pll", KPLL_LOCK,
+		KPLL_CON0, NULL),
+};
+
+/* register exynos5410 clocks */
+static void __init exynos5410_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx;
+	void __iomem *reg_base;
+
+	reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
+	if (!reg_base)
+		panic("%s: failed to map registers\n", __func__);
+
+	ctx = samsung_clk_init(np, reg_base, CLK_NR_CLKS);
+
+	samsung_clk_register_pll(ctx, exynos5410_plls,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_plls), reg_base);
+
+	samsung_clk_register_mux(ctx, exynos5410_mux_clks,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_mux_clks));
+	samsung_clk_register_div(ctx, exynos5410_div_clks,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_div_clks));
+	samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, exynos5410_gate_clks,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_gate_clks));
+
+	pr_debug("Exynos5410: clock setup completed.\n");
+}
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(exynos5410_clk, "samsung,exynos5410-clock", exynos5410_clk_init);
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b180f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H
+#define _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H
+
+/* core clocks */
+#define CLK_FIN_PLL 1
+#define CLK_FOUT_APLL 2
+#define CLK_FOUT_CPLL 3
+#define CLK_FOUT_MPLL 4
+#define CLK_FOUT_BPLL 5
+#define CLK_FOUT_KPLL 6
+
+/* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
+#define CLK_SCLK_UART0 128
+#define CLK_SCLK_UART1 129
+#define CLK_SCLK_UART2 130
+#define CLK_SCLK_UART3 131
+#define CLK_SCLK_MMC0 132
+#define CLK_SCLK_MMC1 133
+#define CLK_SCLK_MMC2 134
+
+/* gate clocks */
+#define CLK_UART0 257
+#define CLK_UART1 258
+#define CLK_UART2 259
+#define CLK_UART3 260
+#define CLK_MCT 315
+#define CLK_MMC0 351
+#define CLK_MMC1 352
+#define CLK_MMC2 353
+
+#define CLK_NR_CLKS 512
+
+#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H */
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Tarek Dakhran (2014-05-25 20:23:32)
> The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
> using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
>  4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aeab635
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
> +
> +The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
> +controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +
> +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
> +
> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> +  region.
> +
> +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
> +
> +All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
> +dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
> +tree sources.
> +
> +External clock:
> +
> +There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
> +is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
> +with following clock-output-name:
> +
> + - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI

Does fin_pll feed into the exynos5410-clock controller? If so, should
the example clock-controller node below have a clocks and clock-names
property?

Otherwise patch looks good.

Regards,
Mike

> +
> +Example 1: An example of a clock controller node is listed below.
> +
> +       clock: clock-controller@0x10010000 {
> +               compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-clock";
> +               reg = <0x10010000 0x30000>;
> +               #clock-cells = <1>;
> +       };
> +
> +Example 2: UART controller node that consumes the clock generated by the clock
> +          controller. Refer to the standard clock bindings for information
> +          about 'clocks' and 'clock-names' property.
> +
> +       serial@12C20000 {
> +               compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
> +               reg = <0x12C00000 0x100>;
> +               interrupts = <0 51 0>;
> +               clocks = <&clock CLK_UART0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART0>;
> +               clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
> +       };
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> index 25646c6..69e8177 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS3250)    += clk-exynos3250.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)     += clk-exynos4.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)   += clk-exynos5250.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)   += clk-exynos5260.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)   += clk-exynos5410.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)   += clk-exynos5420.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)   += clk-exynos5440.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-audss.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c9505ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * Author: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * Common Clock Framework support for Exynos5410 SoC.
> +*/
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +#define APLL_LOCK               0x0
> +#define APLL_CON0               0x100
> +#define CPLL_LOCK               0x10020
> +#define CPLL_CON0               0x10120
> +#define MPLL_LOCK               0x4000
> +#define MPLL_CON0               0x4100
> +#define BPLL_LOCK               0x20010
> +#define BPLL_CON0               0x20110
> +#define KPLL_LOCK               0x28000
> +#define KPLL_CON0               0x28100
> +
> +#define SRC_CPU                        0x200
> +#define DIV_CPU0               0x500
> +#define SRC_CPERI1             0x4204
> +#define DIV_TOP0               0x10510
> +#define DIV_TOP1               0x10514
> +#define DIV_FSYS1              0x1054c
> +#define DIV_FSYS2              0x10550
> +#define DIV_PERIC0             0x10558
> +#define SRC_TOP0               0x10210
> +#define SRC_TOP1               0x10214
> +#define SRC_TOP2               0x10218
> +#define SRC_FSYS               0x10244
> +#define SRC_PERIC0             0x10250
> +#define SRC_MASK_FSYS          0x10340
> +#define SRC_MASK_PERIC0                0x10350
> +#define GATE_BUS_FSYS0         0x10740
> +#define GATE_IP_FSYS           0x10944
> +#define GATE_IP_PERIC          0x10950
> +#define GATE_IP_PERIS          0x10960
> +#define SRC_CDREX              0x20200
> +#define SRC_KFC                        0x28200
> +#define DIV_KFC0               0x28500
> +
> +/* list of PLLs */
> +enum exynos5410_plls {
> +       apll, cpll, mpll,
> +       bpll, kpll,
> +       nr_plls                 /* number of PLLs */
> +};
> +
> +/* list of all parent clocks */
> +PNAME(apll_p)          = { "fin_pll", "fout_apll", };
> +PNAME(bpll_p)          = { "fin_pll", "fout_bpll", };
> +PNAME(cpll_p)          = { "fin_pll", "fout_cpll" };
> +PNAME(mpll_p)          = { "fin_pll", "fout_mpll", };
> +PNAME(kpll_p)          = { "fin_pll", "fout_kpll", };
> +
> +PNAME(mout_cpu_p)      = { "mout_apll", "sclk_mpll", };
> +PNAME(mout_kfc_p)      = { "mout_kpll", "sclk_mpll", };
> +
> +PNAME(mpll_user_p)     = { "fin_pll", "sclk_mpll", };
> +PNAME(bpll_user_p)     = { "fin_pll", "sclk_bpll", };
> +PNAME(mpll_bpll_p)     = { "sclk_mpll_muxed", "sclk_bpll_muxed", };
> +
> +PNAME(group2_p)                = { "fin_pll", "fin_pll", "none", "none",
> +                       "none", "none", "sclk_mpll_bpll",
> +                        "none", "none", "sclk_cpll" };
> +
> +static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5410_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
> +       MUX(0, "mout_apll", apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "mout_kpll", kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_mpll", mpll_p, SRC_CPERI1, 8, 1),
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_mpll_muxed", mpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 20, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_bpll", bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_bpll_muxed", bpll_user_p, SRC_TOP2, 24, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_cpll", cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "sclk_mpll_bpll", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP1, 20, 1),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "mout_mmc0", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 0, 4),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_mmc1", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 4, 4),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_mmc2", group2_p, SRC_FSYS, 8, 4),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "mout_uart0", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 0, 4),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_uart1", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 4, 4),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_uart2", group2_p, SRC_PERIC0, 8, 4),
> +
> +       MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 12, 1),
> +       MUX(0, "mout_aclk400", mpll_bpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 20, 1),
> +};
> +
> +static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5410_div_clks[] __initdata = {
> +       DIV(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "div_arm2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "div_acp", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 8, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "div_cpud", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 4, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "div_atb", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 16, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "pclk_dbg", "div_arm2", DIV_CPU0, 20, 3),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "div_kfc", "mout_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 0, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "div_aclk", "div_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 4, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "div_pclk", "div_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 20, 3),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "aclk66_pre", "sclk_mpll_muxed", DIV_TOP1, 24, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "aclk66", "aclk66_pre", DIV_TOP0, 0, 3),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "div_mmc0", "mout_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 0, 4),
> +       DIV(0, "div_mmc1", "mout_mmc1", DIV_FSYS1, 16, 4),
> +       DIV(0, "div_mmc2", "mout_mmc2", DIV_FSYS2, 0, 4),
> +
> +       DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0",
> +                       DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre1", "div_mmc1",
> +                       DIV_FSYS1, 24, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre2", "div_mmc2",
> +                       DIV_FSYS2, 8, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "div_uart0", "mout_uart0", DIV_PERIC0, 0, 4),
> +       DIV(0, "div_uart1", "mout_uart1", DIV_PERIC0, 4, 4),
> +       DIV(0, "div_uart2", "mout_uart2", DIV_PERIC0, 8, 4),
> +       DIV(0, "div_uart3", "mout_uart3", DIV_PERIC0, 12, 4),
> +
> +       DIV(0, "aclk200", "mout_aclk200", DIV_TOP0, 12, 3),
> +       DIV(0, "aclk400", "mout_aclk400", DIV_TOP0, 24, 3),
> +};
> +
> +static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5410_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
> +       GATE(CLK_MCT, "mct", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIS, 18, 0, 0),
> +
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC0, "sclk_mmc0", "div_mmc_pre0",
> +                       SRC_MASK_FSYS, 0, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC1, "sclk_mmc1", "div_mmc_pre1",
> +                       SRC_MASK_FSYS, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_MMC2, "sclk_mmc2", "div_mmc_pre2",
> +                       SRC_MASK_FSYS, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +
> +       GATE(CLK_MMC0, "sdmmc0", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 12, 0, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_MMC1, "sdmmc1", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 13, 0, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_MMC2, "sdmmc2", "aclk200", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 14, 0, 0),
> +
> +       GATE(CLK_UART0, "uart0", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 0, 0, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_UART1, "uart1", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 1, 0, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_UART2, "uart2", "aclk66", GATE_IP_PERIC, 2, 0, 0),
> +
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART0, "sclk_uart0", "div_uart0",
> +                       SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 0, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART1, "sclk_uart1", "div_uart1",
> +                       SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +       GATE(CLK_SCLK_UART2, "sclk_uart2", "div_uart2",
> +                       SRC_MASK_PERIC0, 8, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> +};
> +
> +static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5410_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
> +       [apll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_APLL, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
> +               APLL_CON0, NULL),
> +       [cpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_CPLL, "fout_cpll", "fin_pll", CPLL_LOCK,
> +               CPLL_CON0, NULL),
> +       [mpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_MPLL, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
> +               MPLL_CON0, NULL),
> +       [bpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_BPLL, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
> +               BPLL_CON0, NULL),
> +       [kpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, CLK_FOUT_KPLL, "fout_kpll", "fin_pll", KPLL_LOCK,
> +               KPLL_CON0, NULL),
> +};
> +
> +/* register exynos5410 clocks */
> +static void __init exynos5410_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx;
> +       void __iomem *reg_base;
> +
> +       reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +       if (!reg_base)
> +               panic("%s: failed to map registers\n", __func__);
> +
> +       ctx = samsung_clk_init(np, reg_base, CLK_NR_CLKS);
> +
> +       samsung_clk_register_pll(ctx, exynos5410_plls,
> +                       ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_plls), reg_base);
> +
> +       samsung_clk_register_mux(ctx, exynos5410_mux_clks,
> +                       ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_mux_clks));
> +       samsung_clk_register_div(ctx, exynos5410_div_clks,
> +                       ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_div_clks));
> +       samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, exynos5410_gate_clks,
> +                       ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5410_gate_clks));
> +
> +       pr_debug("Exynos5410: clock setup completed.\n");
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(exynos5410_clk, "samsung,exynos5410-clock", exynos5410_clk_init);
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9b180f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H
> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H
> +
> +/* core clocks */
> +#define CLK_FIN_PLL 1
> +#define CLK_FOUT_APLL 2
> +#define CLK_FOUT_CPLL 3
> +#define CLK_FOUT_MPLL 4
> +#define CLK_FOUT_BPLL 5
> +#define CLK_FOUT_KPLL 6
> +
> +/* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
> +#define CLK_SCLK_UART0 128
> +#define CLK_SCLK_UART1 129
> +#define CLK_SCLK_UART2 130
> +#define CLK_SCLK_UART3 131
> +#define CLK_SCLK_MMC0 132
> +#define CLK_SCLK_MMC1 133
> +#define CLK_SCLK_MMC2 134
> +
> +/* gate clocks */
> +#define CLK_UART0 257
> +#define CLK_UART1 258
> +#define CLK_UART2 259
> +#define CLK_UART3 260
> +#define CLK_MCT 315
> +#define CLK_MMC0 351
> +#define CLK_MMC1 352
> +#define CLK_MMC2 353
> +
> +#define CLK_NR_CLKS 512
> +
> +#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5410_H */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

[Tarek Dakhran]

Hi Mike,

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Tarek Dakhran (2014-05-25 20:23:32)
>> The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
>> using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
>>  4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..aeab635
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>> +* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
>> +
>> +The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
>> +controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
>> +
>> +Required Properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
>> +
>> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>> +  region.
>> +
>> +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
>> +
>> +All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
>> +dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
>> +tree sources.
>> +
>> +External clock:
>> +
>> +There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
>> +is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
>> +with following clock-output-name:
>> +
>> + - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI
>
> Does fin_pll feed into the exynos5410-clock controller? If so, should
> the example clock-controller node below have a clocks and clock-names
> property?

fin_pll does not feed into exynos5410-clock controller, but into mct do.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3839c26
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
> +/*
> + * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *             http://www.samsung.com
> + *
> + * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device nodes are listed in this file.
> + * EXYNOS5410 based board files can include this file and provide
> + * values for board specfic bindings.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include "skeleton.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +       compatible = "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5";
> +       interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
[snip]
> +               mct: mct@101C0000 {
> +                       compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct";
> +                       reg = <0x101C0000 0xB00>;
> +                       interrupt-parent = <&interrupt_map>;
> +                       interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>,
> +                               <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>,
> +                               <8>, <9>, <10>, <11>;
> +                       clocks = <&fin_pll>, <&clock CLK_MCT>;
> +                       clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
> +
> +                       interrupt_map: interrupt-map {
> +                               #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +                               #address-cells = <0>;
> +                               #size-cells = <0>;
> +                               interrupt-map = <0 &combiner 23 3>,
> +                                               <1 &combiner 23 4>,
> +                                               <2 &combiner 25 2>,
> +                                               <3 &combiner 25 3>,
> +                                               <4 &gic 0 120 0>,
> +                                               <5 &gic 0 121 0>,
> +                                               <6 &gic 0 122 0>,
> +                                               <7 &gic 0 123 0>,
> +                                               <8 &gic 0 128 0>,
> +                                               <9 &gic 0 129 0>,
> +                                               <10 &gic 0 130 0>,
> +                                               <11 &gic 0 131 0>;
> +                       };
> +               };
> +

That's why I documented fin_pll. Should I add mct binding example to
documentation too?

Best regards,
     Tarek

RE: [PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

[Kukjin Kim]

Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> Quoting Tarek Dakhran (2014-05-25 20:23:32)
> > The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
> > using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
> >  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
> >  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-
> clock.txt
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-
> clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..aeab635
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
> > +
> > +The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
> > +controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
> > +
> > +Required Properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
> > +
> > +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> mapped
> > +  region.
> > +
> > +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
> > +
> > +All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
> > +dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
> > +tree sources.
> > +
> > +External clock:
> > +
> > +There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
> > +is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
> > +with following clock-output-name:
> > +
> > + - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI
> 
> Does fin_pll feed into the exynos5410-clock controller? If so, should
> the example clock-controller node below have a clocks and clock-names
> property?
> 
Well, it is fixed clocks and generated outside of the SoC...so maybe the properties are not required?

BTW, I've applied this series with Tomasz Figa's reviewed tag and sent out to arm-soc today so if any concerns on this, please let me know immediately.

> Otherwise patch looks good.
> 

Thanks,
Kukjin

RE: [PATCH v11 2/3] clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-27 21:49:49)
> Mike Turquette wrote:
> > 
> > Quoting Tarek Dakhran (2014-05-25 20:23:32)
> > > The EXYNOS5410 clocks are statically listed and registered
> > > using the Samsung specific common clock helper functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
> > >  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
> > >  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209
> > ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
> > >  4 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-
> > clock.txt
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-
> > clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..aeab635
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > > +* Samsung Exynos5410 Clock Controller
> > > +
> > > +The Exynos5410 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
> > > +controllers within the Exynos5410 SoC.
> > > +
> > > +Required Properties:
> > > +
> > > +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5410-clock"
> > > +
> > > +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> > mapped
> > > +  region.
> > > +
> > > +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
> > > +
> > > +All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in
> > > +dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h header and can be used in device
> > > +tree sources.
> > > +
> > > +External clock:
> > > +
> > > +There is clock that is generated outside the SoC. It
> > > +is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings
> > > +with following clock-output-name:
> > > +
> > > + - "fin_pll" - PLL input clock from XXTI
> > 
> > Does fin_pll feed into the exynos5410-clock controller? If so, should
> > the example clock-controller node below have a clocks and clock-names
> > property?
> > 
> Well, it is fixed clocks and generated outside of the SoC...so maybe the properties are not required?

I guess the fin_pll parts of the binding description are not needed
then. This isn't a big issue, but I think that someone reading that
binding (like myself) might conclude that there is some relationship
between the clock controller and the external clock, which seems not to
be the case.

> 
> BTW, I've applied this series with Tomasz Figa's reviewed tag and sent out to arm-soc today so if any concerns on this, please let me know immediately.

As far as I can tell the fin_pll paragraph can be removed at a later
date. It isn't part of any real DT binding description such as a
property or definition. So no need to cause havoc for your existing pull
request.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> > Otherwise patch looks good.
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kukjin
> 

[PATCH v11 3/3] ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS5410

[Tarek Dakhran]

Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS5410 SoC and SMDK5410 board.

Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                |    1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts |   82 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi         |  206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 289 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index cd399a2..709f862 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos4210-origen.dtb \
 	exynos5250-smdk5250.dtb \
 	exynos5250-snow.dtb \
 	exynos5260-xyref5260.dtb \
+	exynos5410-smdk5410.dtb \
 	exynos5420-arndale-octa.dtb \
 	exynos5420-peach-pit.dtb \
 	exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb \
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7275bbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * SAMSUNG SMDK5410 board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *		http://www.samsung.com
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+*/
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "exynos5410.dtsi"
+/ {
+	model = "Samsung SMDK5410 board based on EXYNOS5410";
+	compatible = "samsung,smdk5410", "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5";
+
+	memory {
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x80000000>;
+	};
+
+	chosen {
+		bootargs = "console=ttySAC2,115200";
+	};
+
+	fin_pll: xxti {
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+		clock-output-names = "fin_pll";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	firmware@02037000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,secure-firmware";
+		reg = <0x02037000 0x1000>;
+	};
+
+};
+
+&mmc_0 {
+	status = "okay";
+	num-slots = <1>;
+	supports-highspeed;
+	broken-cd;
+	card-detect-delay = <200>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+
+	slot@0 {
+		reg = <0>;
+		bus-width = <8>;
+	};
+};
+
+&mmc_2 {
+	status = "okay";
+	num-slots = <1>;
+	supports-highspeed;
+	card-detect-delay = <200>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
+	samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+
+	slot@0 {
+		reg = <0>;
+		bus-width = <4>;
+		disable-wp;
+	};
+};
+
+&uart0 {
+		status = "okay";
+};
+
+&uart1 {
+		status = "okay";
+};
+
+&uart2 {
+		status = "okay";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3839c26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+/*
+ * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *		http://www.samsung.com
+ *
+ * SAMSUNG EXYNOS5410 SoC device nodes are listed in this file.
+ * EXYNOS5410 based board files can include this file and provide
+ * values for board specfic bindings.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include "skeleton.dtsi"
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h>
+
+/ {
+	compatible = "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5";
+	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+
+	cpus {
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+
+		CPU0: cpu@0 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
+			reg = <0x0>;
+		};
+
+		CPU1: cpu@1 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
+			reg = <0x1>;
+		};
+
+		CPU2: cpu@2 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
+			reg = <0x2>;
+		};
+
+		CPU3: cpu@3 {
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
+			reg = <0x3>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	soc: soc {
+		compatible = "simple-bus";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <1>;
+		ranges;
+
+		combiner: interrupt-controller@10440000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner";
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			samsung,combiner-nr = <32>;
+			reg = <0x10440000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts =	<0 0 0>, <0 1 0>, <0 2 0>, <0 3 0>,
+					<0 4 0>, <0 5 0>, <0 6 0>, <0 7 0>,
+					<0 8 0>, <0 9 0>, <0 10 0>, <0 11 0>,
+					<0 12 0>, <0 13 0>, <0 14 0>, <0 15 0>,
+					<0 16 0>, <0 17 0>, <0 18 0>, <0 19 0>,
+					<0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>, <0 23 0>,
+					<0 24 0>, <0 25 0>, <0 26 0>, <0 27 0>,
+					<0 28 0>, <0 29 0>, <0 30 0>, <0 31 0>;
+		};
+
+		gic: interrupt-controller@10481000 {
+			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic", "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
+			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			reg =	<0x10481000 0x1000>,
+				<0x10482000 0x1000>,
+				<0x10484000 0x2000>,
+				<0x10486000 0x2000>;
+			interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
+		};
+
+		chipid@10000000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-chipid";
+			reg = <0x10000000 0x100>;
+		};
+
+		mct: mct@101C0000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct";
+			reg = <0x101C0000 0xB00>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&interrupt_map>;
+			interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>,
+				<4>, <5>, <6>, <7>,
+				<8>, <9>, <10>, <11>;
+			clocks = <&fin_pll>, <&clock CLK_MCT>;
+			clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
+
+			interrupt_map: interrupt-map {
+				#interrupt-cells = <1>;
+				#address-cells = <0>;
+				#size-cells = <0>;
+				interrupt-map = <0 &combiner 23 3>,
+						<1 &combiner 23 4>,
+						<2 &combiner 25 2>,
+						<3 &combiner 25 3>,
+						<4 &gic 0 120 0>,
+						<5 &gic 0 121 0>,
+						<6 &gic 0 122 0>,
+						<7 &gic 0 123 0>,
+						<8 &gic 0 128 0>,
+						<9 &gic 0 129 0>,
+						<10 &gic 0 130 0>,
+						<11 &gic 0 131 0>;
+			};
+		};
+
+		sysram@02020000 {
+			compatible = "mmio-sram";
+			reg = <0x02020000 0x54000>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges = <0 0x02020000 0x54000>;
+
+			smp-sysram@0 {
+				compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-sysram";
+				reg = <0x0 0x1000>;
+			};
+
+			smp-sysram@53000 {
+				compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-sysram-ns";
+				reg = <0x53000 0x1000>;
+			};
+		};
+
+		clock: clock-controller@10010000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-clock";
+			reg = <0x10010000 0x30000>;
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+		};
+
+		mmc_0: mmc@12200000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc";
+			reg = <0x12200000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <0 75 0>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_MMC0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_MMC0>;
+			clock-names = "biu", "ciu";
+			fifo-depth = <0x80>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		mmc_1: mmc@12210000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc";
+			reg = <0x12210000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <0 76 0>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_MMC1>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_MMC1>;
+			clock-names = "biu", "ciu";
+			fifo-depth = <0x80>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		mmc_2: mmc@12220000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc";
+			reg = <0x12220000 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <0 77 0>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_MMC2>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_MMC2>;
+			clock-names = "biu", "ciu";
+			fifo-depth = <0x80>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		uart0: serial@12C00000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
+			reg = <0x12C00000 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <0 51 0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_UART0>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART0>;
+			clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		uart1: serial@12C10000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
+			reg = <0x12C10000 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <0 52 0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_UART1>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART1>;
+			clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		uart2: serial@12C20000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
+			reg = <0x12C20000 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <0 53 0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_UART2>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART2>;
+			clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+	};
+};
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi,

On 26.05.2014 05:23, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
> 
> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
> 
> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
> tree for Exynos 5410.
> 
> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
> 
> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
> 
> I hope this is clean and would be applied.
> 
> Tarek.
> 
> Tarek Dakhran (3):
>   ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC
>   clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework
>   ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS5410
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |    1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts          |   82 ++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi                  |  206 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |    5 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h                      |   12 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
>  9 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
> 

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Kukjin Kim]

On 05/26/14 20:11, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi

> On 26.05.2014 05:23, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>
>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>
>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>
>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>    (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>
>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>
Thanks for your test with exynos_defconfig and multi_v7_defconfig.

>> I hope this is clean and would be applied.
>>
>> Tarek.
>>
>> Tarek Dakhran (3):
>>    ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for EXYNOS5410 SoC
>>    clk: exynos5410: register clocks using common clock framework
>>    ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS5410
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt |   45 +++++
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |    1 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts          |   82 ++++++++
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi                  |  206 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h                      |   12 +-
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |    1 +
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c               |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h             |   33 ++++
>>   9 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5410-clock.txt
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5410.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5410.h
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
>
Applied this whole series.

Thanks,
Kukjin

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Kevin Hilman]

Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:

> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>
> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>
> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
> tree for Exynos 5410.
>
> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>
> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
multi_v7_defconfig.)

Kevin

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Kevin Hilman]

Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> writes:

> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>
>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>
>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>
>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>
>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>
>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>
> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
> multi_v7_defconfig.)

Oops, I may have spoke to soon.  There seem to be some problems with
multi_v7_defconfig.

Applying this series directly on the commit mentioned above and testing,
it works just fine using multi_v7_defconfig.

However, if I directly test the current contents of the samsung for-next
branch (where this series has been merged) it no longer boots on the
odroid-xu.

A quick diff shows that there are some other changes to
multi_v7_defconfig in the samsung/for-next branch that may be causing
problems here.

Kevin

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tarek Dakhran]

Hi,

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>>
>>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>>
>>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>>
>>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>>
>>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>>
>>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>                  2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>                  3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>                  4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>
>> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
>> multi_v7_defconfig.)
>
> Oops, I may have spoke to soon.  There seem to be some problems with
> multi_v7_defconfig.
>
> Applying this series directly on the commit mentioned above and testing,
> it works just fine using multi_v7_defconfig.

Thank you for testing.

> However, if I directly test the current contents of the samsung for-next
> branch (where this series has been merged) it no longer boots on the
> odroid-xu.
> A quick diff shows that there are some other changes to
> multi_v7_defconfig in the samsung/for-next branch that may be causing
> problems here.

Yes. Right you are. There is no ARCH_EXYNOS defined in multi_v7_defconfig
at current state (branch: for-next commit: ca610da Merge branch
'v3.16-next/dt-samsung-3' into for-next).
So booting kernel on 5410 SoC is not possible with multi_v7_defconfig.
Please use exynos_defconfig.

>
> Kevin

Best regards,
     Tarek

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tomasz Figa]

On 27.05.2014 22:17, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>>>
>>>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>>>
>>>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>>>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>>>
>>>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>>>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>>>
>>>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>                  2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>>                  3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>                  4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
>>> multi_v7_defconfig.)
>>
>> Oops, I may have spoke to soon.  There seem to be some problems with
>> multi_v7_defconfig.
>>
>> Applying this series directly on the commit mentioned above and testing,
>> it works just fine using multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> Thank you for testing.
> 
>> However, if I directly test the current contents of the samsung for-next
>> branch (where this series has been merged) it no longer boots on the
>> odroid-xu.
>> A quick diff shows that there are some other changes to
>> multi_v7_defconfig in the samsung/for-next branch that may be causing
>> problems here.
> 
> Yes. Right you are. There is no ARCH_EXYNOS defined in multi_v7_defconfig
> at current state (branch: for-next commit: ca610da Merge branch
> 'v3.16-next/dt-samsung-3' into for-next).
> So booting kernel on 5410 SoC is not possible with multi_v7_defconfig.
> Please use exynos_defconfig.

I wonder if this patch isn't maybe the missing part:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/32414

Olof asked Kukjin to separate it from his pull requests, so it can be
applied directly to ARM SoC tree to avoid conflicts.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Kevin Hilman]

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27.05.2014 22:17, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>>>>
>>>>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>>>>
>>>>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>>>>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>>>>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>>>>
>>>>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>>                  2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>>>                  3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>>                  4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
>>>> multi_v7_defconfig.)
>>>
>>> Oops, I may have spoke to soon.  There seem to be some problems with
>>> multi_v7_defconfig.
>>>
>>> Applying this series directly on the commit mentioned above and testing,
>>> it works just fine using multi_v7_defconfig.
>>
>> Thank you for testing.
>>
>>> However, if I directly test the current contents of the samsung for-next
>>> branch (where this series has been merged) it no longer boots on the
>>> odroid-xu.
>>> A quick diff shows that there are some other changes to
>>> multi_v7_defconfig in the samsung/for-next branch that may be causing
>>> problems here.
>>
>> Yes. Right you are. There is no ARCH_EXYNOS defined in multi_v7_defconfig
>> at current state (branch: for-next commit: ca610da Merge branch
>> 'v3.16-next/dt-samsung-3' into for-next).
>> So booting kernel on 5410 SoC is not possible with multi_v7_defconfig.
>> Please use exynos_defconfig.
>
> I wonder if this patch isn't maybe the missing part:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/32414
>
> Olof asked Kukjin to separate it from his pull requests, so it can be
> applied directly to ARM SoC tree to avoid conflicts.

Yup, samsung/for-next + that patch boots fine on the odroid-xu using
multi_v7_defconfig.

Thanks,

Kevin

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Tarek and Kevin,

Am 27.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Kevin Hilman:
> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
> 
>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>
>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>
>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>
>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>   (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>
>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
> 
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> 
> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
> multi_v7_defconfig.)

Could you clarify: Are you using exynos5410-smdk5410.dts with the
ODROID-XU or do you have some upcoming exynos5410-odroidxu.dts based on
exynos5410.dtsi?

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tarek Dakhran]

Hi Andreas,

On 05/29/2014 05:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Tarek and Kevin,
>
> Am 27.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Kevin Hilman:
>> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>>
>>> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC
>>>
>>> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture
>>>
>>> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device
>>> tree for Exynos 5410.
>>>
>>> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel
>>>    (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next)
>>>
>>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>>> 		    2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>> 		    3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>>> 		    4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>
>> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
>> multi_v7_defconfig.)
> Could you clarify: Are you using exynos5410-smdk5410.dts with the
> ODROID-XU or do you have some upcoming exynos5410-odroidxu.dts based on
> exynos5410.dtsi?
We use exynos5410-smdk5410.dts for booting ODROID-XU.

>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>


-- 
Best regards,
     Tarek Dakhran

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Tarek,

[shortening the CC list a bit]

Am 29.05.2014 16:46, schrieb Tarek Dakhran:
> On 05/29/2014 05:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 27.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Kevin Hilman:
>>> Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>             2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>>>             3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig)
>>>>             4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig)
>>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and
>>> multi_v7_defconfig.)
>> Could you clarify: Are you using exynos5410-smdk5410.dts with the
>> ODROID-XU or do you have some upcoming exynos5410-odroidxu.dts based on
>> exynos5410.dtsi?
> We use exynos5410-smdk5410.dts for booting ODROID-XU.

Thanks a lot for your work!

I've successfully booted for-next on ODROID-XU using that .dts and
exynos_defconfig plus some systemd and KVM options.

Once I got the following panic:

[    7.579120] Freeing unused kernel memory: 260K (c04f5000 - c0536000)
[    7.647496] Unhandled fault: asynchronous external abort (0x1211) at
0x00000000
[    7.659656] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
exitcode=0x00000007
[    7.659656]
[    7.667345] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
3.15.0-rc4-00074-gca610da #1
[    7.674465] [<c00218b4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001eaa4>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[    7.682174] [<c001eaa4>] (show_stack) from [<c03a316c>]
(dump_stack+0x80/0xc0)
[    7.689371] [<c03a316c>] (dump_stack) from [<c03a0618>]
(panic+0xa4/0x200)
[    7.696222] [<c03a0618>] (panic) from [<c002c79c>]
(complete_and_exit+0x0/0x1c)
[    7.703503] [<c002c79c>] (complete_and_exit) from [<00000001>] (0x1)
[    7.709844] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill
init! exitcode=0x00000007
[    7.709844]

And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):

[    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
[    0.045968] /cpus/cpu@0 missing clock-frequency property
[    0.045993] /cpus/cpu@1 missing clock-frequency property
[    0.046016] /cpus/cpu@2 missing clock-frequency property
[    0.046040] /cpus/cpu@3 missing clock-frequency property
[    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
[    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 - 0x403a8978
[    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
[    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
[    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
[    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
[    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
[    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
[    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.

I also notice another apparent device tree issue:

[    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
[    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'

Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
(The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)

Some of the low-hanging fruit like no heartbeat/SD LEDs, no RTC, no
usb3503 and thus no network I'm already looking into myself. For now I'm
putting everything into the SMDK .dts, but I guess we'll need to split
off -odroidxu.dts and -pinctrl.dtsi at some point.

What about graphics? The 5410 is an oddball in using PowerVR rather than
Mali GPU - should a framebuffer on HDMI or DisplayPort work if we add DT
nodes, or will the GPU require larger code changes?

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tushar Behera]

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi Tarek,
>
>
> And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
> in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):
>
> [    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
> [    0.045968] /cpus/cpu@0 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.045993] /cpus/cpu@1 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046016] /cpus/cpu@2 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046040] /cpus/cpu@3 missing clock-frequency property
> [    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
> [    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 - 0x403a8978
> [    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
> [    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
> [    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
> [    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
> [    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
> [    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
> [    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.
>
> I also notice another apparent device tree issue:
>
> [    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
> [    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>
> Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
> (The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)
>

Can you check after applying following two patches for Arndale-Octa
([1],[2])? In other words, a patch similar to [2] might be required
for this board too if it is booting under secure mode.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31776.html

[PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode

[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31777.html

[PATCH v2 Resend 2/2] ARM: dts: Add secure firmware support for Arndale-octa


--
Tushar Behera

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tarek Dakhran]

Hi,

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Tushar Behera <trblinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Hi Tarek,
>>
>>
>> And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
>> in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):
>>
>> [    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
>> [    0.045968] /cpus/cpu@0 missing clock-frequency property
>> [    0.045993] /cpus/cpu@1 missing clock-frequency property
>> [    0.046016] /cpus/cpu@2 missing clock-frequency property
>> [    0.046040] /cpus/cpu@3 missing clock-frequency property
>> [    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
>> [    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 - 0x403a8978
>> [    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
>> [    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
>> [    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
>> [    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
>> [    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
>> [    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
>> [    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.
>>
>> I also notice another apparent device tree issue:
>>
>> [    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>> [    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>>
>> Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
>> (The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)
>>
>
> Can you check after applying following two patches for Arndale-Octa
> ([1],[2])? In other words, a patch similar to [2] might be required
> for this board too if it is booting under secure mode.

Firmware node already present into exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
So with only patch[1] 4xA15 cores will boot on ODROID-XU and SMDK5410.

>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31776.html
>
> [PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode
>
> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31777.html
>
> [PATCH v2 Resend 2/2] ARM: dts: Add secure firmware support for Arndale-octa
>
>
> --
> Tushar Behera

Best regards,
    Tarek

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Kevin Hilman]

Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Tushar Behera <trblinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Tarek,
>>>
>>>
>>> And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
>>> in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):
>>>
>>> [    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
>>> [    0.045968] /cpus/cpu@0 missing clock-frequency property
>>> [    0.045993] /cpus/cpu@1 missing clock-frequency property
>>> [    0.046016] /cpus/cpu@2 missing clock-frequency property
>>> [    0.046040] /cpus/cpu@3 missing clock-frequency property
>>> [    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
>>> [    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 - 0x403a8978
>>> [    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
>>> [    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
>>> [    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
>>> [    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
>>> [    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
>>> [    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
>>> [    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.
>>>
>>> I also notice another apparent device tree issue:
>>>
>>> [    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>>> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>>> [    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>>> node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>>>
>>> Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
>>> (The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)
>>>
>>
>> Can you check after applying following two patches for Arndale-Octa
>> ([1],[2])? In other words, a patch similar to [2] might be required
>> for this board too if it is booting under secure mode.
>
> Firmware node already present into exynos5410-smdk5410.dts
> So with only patch[1] 4xA15 cores will boot on ODROID-XU and SMDK5410.

I also confirm that with 4xA15 cores boot when adding patch [1].

Kevin

>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31776.html
>>
>> [PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode
>>
>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31777.html
>>
>> [PATCH v2 Resend 2/2] ARM: dts: Add secure firmware support for Arndale-octa
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tushar Behera
>
> Best regards,
>     Tarek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tarek Dakhran]

Hi all,

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 30 May 2014, Tushar Behera <trblinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> > Hi Tarek,
>> >
>> >
>> > And I reproducibly get failures for CPUs 1-3, resulting in only one CPU
>> > in /proc/cpuinfo (compared to 4 on downstream 3.14):
>> >
>> > [    0.045778] CPU: Testing write buffer coherency: ok
>> > [    0.045968] /cpus/cpu@0 missing clock-frequency property
>> > [    0.045993] /cpus/cpu@1 missing clock-frequency property
>> > [    0.046016] /cpus/cpu@2 missing clock-frequency property
>> > [    0.046040] /cpus/cpu@3 missing clock-frequency property
>> > [    0.046059] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
>> > [    0.046135] Setting up static identity map for 0x403a8920 -
>> > 0x403a8978
>> > [    2.075052] CPU1: failed to come online
>> > [    4.085095] CPU2: failed to come online
>> > [    6.095142] CPU3: failed to come online
>> > [    6.095237] Brought up 1 CPUs
>> > [    6.095269] SMP: Total of 1 processors activated.
>> > [    6.095303] CPU: All CPU(s) started in HYP mode.
>> > [    6.095336] CPU: Virtualization extensions available.
>> >
>> > I also notice another apparent device tree issue:
>> >
>> > [    7.341814] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>> > node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>> > [    7.341850] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse gpios property of
>> > node '/soc/mmc@12220000/slot@0[0]'
>> >
>> > Are any of those known issues and being worked on?
>> > (The CPU failures affected 5420 Arndale Octa as well iirc.)
>> >

[snip]

>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31776.html
>>
>> [PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure
>> mode
>>
>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31777.html
>>
>> [PATCH v2 Resend 2/2] ARM: dts: Add secure firmware support for
>> Arndale-octa
>>
>>
>> Kukjin,
>
> Can you please apply the above patches?
>

Patches [1], [2] tested on ODROID-XU, SMDK5410 and Arndale Octa boards.

Tested-by: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@samsung.com>

Best regards,
     Tarek

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi Andreas,

On 29.05.2014 20:00, Andreas Färber wrote:

[snip]

> Some of the low-hanging fruit like no heartbeat/SD LEDs, no RTC, no
> usb3503 and thus no network I'm already looking into myself. For now I'm
> putting everything into the SMDK .dts, but I guess we'll need to split
> off -odroidxu.dts and -pinctrl.dtsi at some point.

Odroid XU needs its own dts for sure. I think you can make a copy of
SMDK dts and name it -odroidxu straightaway and work further with it.

exynos5410-pinctrl.dtsi is used for generic SoC-wide pinctrl
definitions, such as pin banks and pin groups. There should be no
board-specific things defined in it. Instead respective board dts should
have them.

> 
> What about graphics? The 5410 is an oddball in using PowerVR rather than
> Mali GPU - should a framebuffer on HDMI or DisplayPort work if we add DT
> nodes, or will the GPU require larger code changes?

The 3D GPU is completely independent from display controllers, which are
standard Samsung IP blocks, so you should be able to get unaccelerated
output using VP+Mixer+HDMI or FIMD+DP using existing drivers.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html