From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] ARM: shmobile: koelsch reference: Enable DMA for QSPI Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 08:29:06 +0900 Message-ID: <20140603232906.GC19407@verge.net.au> References: <1401716531-29794-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <538D50D1.7010900@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Khiem Nguyen , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Ben Dooks , Laurent Pinchart , Linux-sh list , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:05:42AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Khiem Nguyen > wrote: > > I think this patch series should be divided into 2 parts, > > one for DMA in general and one for DMA supporting QSPI. > > > > How do you think about it ? > > I don't think it's worth splitting off just the last patch into a separate > series. > > This is a series, not a single patch. The applyer can always drop some > patches. FWIW, that seems reasonable to me.