devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com,
	alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
	antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: berlin2q.dtsi: set L2CC tag and data latency as 2 cycles
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:44:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140612094423.GC23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402565920-5636-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:38:40PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> For all BG2Q SoCs, 2 cycles is the best/correct value

It would be a good idea to set all these parameters if you need to set
them at all - in other words, setting arm,dirty-latency as well, as
that's all part of the timing specification.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-12  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12  9:38 [PATCH] ARM: dts: berlin2q.dtsi: set L2CC tag and data latency as 2 cycles Jisheng Zhang
2014-06-12  9:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20140612094423.GC23430-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-12 10:15     ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-06-12 10:19       ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-06-16 11:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140612094423.GC23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).