From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Griffin Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 4/7] ARM: stih416-b2020e: Enable PWM on the B2020 Rev-E Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20140619101236.GA7390@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> References: <1403103172-19856-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1403103172-19856-4-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20140619090546.GB2131@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> <20140619092042.GB26560@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140619092042.GB26560@lee--X1> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Lee, > > Why are you only enabling this for rev-E board? > > Purely for testing purposes, as it's the only board I have. If > anyone has the other revisions and would be happy to test the driver > for me then great. Ok that's what I suspected. If you tell me how, I can test on a Rev C board. But as there are several other revisions I think checking the board schematics would be the quickest way forward. > > If you make the stih415 DT PWM nodes part of this series as well, then > > assuming there is no good reason to the contary, the PWM could > > be enabled for both stih415/6 in the common stih41x-b2020 DTS file which > > is also included by rev-E (assuming that PWM wiring is not some rev-E specific > > thing). Can you add the stih415 bindings in V2 as well? regards, Peter