From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Suman Tripathi <stripathi@apm.com>
Cc: olof@lixom.net, arnd@arndb.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ddutile@redhat.com,
jcm@redhat.com, patches@apm.com, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] ata: Fix the link down in first attempt for the APM X-Gene SoC AHCI SATA host controller driver.
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:29:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140623182929.GB18451@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403518538-30697-3-git-send-email-stripathi@apm.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:45:37PM +0530, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> @@ -234,15 +237,20 @@ static int xgene_ahci_do_hardreset(struct ata_link *link,
> u8 *d2h_fis = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_D2H_REG;
> void __iomem *port_mmio = ahci_port_base(ap);
> struct ata_taskfile tf;
> + int link_down_retry = 0;
> int rc;
> u32 val;
>
> - /* clear D2H reception area to properly wait for D2H FIS */
> - ata_tf_init(link->device, &tf);
> - tf.command = ATA_BUSY;
> - ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, 0, 0, d2h_fis);
> - rc = sata_link_hardreset(link, timing, deadline, online,
> + do {
> + /* clear D2H reception area to properly wait for D2H FIS */
> + ata_tf_init(link->device, &tf);
> + tf.command = ATA_BUSY;
> + ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, 0, 0, d2h_fis);
> + rc = sata_link_hardreset(link, timing, deadline, online,
> ahci_check_ready);
> + if (*online)
> + break;
> + } while (link_down_retry++ < MAX_LINK_DOWN_RETRY);
Hmm... so it's retrying w/o extending deadline if the link is reported
to be offline. This definitely needs comment explaining what's going
on. Wouldn't it make more sense to change @timing instead rather than
retrying resets? sata_sil24 already does something similar. Does,
f.e., using sata_deb_timing_long for @timing make the problem go away?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 10:15 [PATCH v1 0/3] ata: Fixes related to APM X-Gene SATA host controller driver Suman Tripathi
2014-06-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] ata: Fix the watermark threshold for the " Suman Tripathi
2014-06-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] ata: Fix the link down in first attempt for the APM X-Gene SoC AHCI " Suman Tripathi
2014-06-23 18:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-06-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: Fix the APM X-Gene SoC SATA PHY clock DTS node csr-mask of the SATA Host Controller 1 Suman Tripathi
2014-06-23 10:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140623182929.GB18451@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=lho@apm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=patches@apm.com \
--cc=stripathi@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).