From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20140703093348.GA32208@lee--X1> References: <1404310129-14667-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1404317194.4109.13.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com> <1404379248.18039.31.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404379248.18039.31.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Maxime Coquelin , Peter Griffin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 03 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2014, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Maxime Coquelin: > > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. > > For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the=20 > > dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. > >=20 > > If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I m= ight=20 > > have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. > > Philipp, does that sound reasonable? >=20 > Patch 4 depends on patch 1 for the header. My tree is still empty, ho= w > about I take the first two, and you merge that branch and then take 3 > and 4 on top? >=20 > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git reset/for_v3.17 >=20 > Lee, shall I also add your Ack to the documentation patch? I don't think there's anything to contentious in there: Acked-by: Lee Jones --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog