From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:42:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20140708134203.GD4979@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1404728173-20263-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1404728173-20263-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404728173-20263-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Antoine =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?= Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, kishon@ti.com, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, zmxu@marvell.com, jszhang@marvell.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org One more thing. On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Antoine T=E9nart wrote: > This introduce a new way of defining SATA ports in the device tree, w= ith > one port per sub-node. This as the advantage of allowing a per port > configuration. Because some ports may be accessible but disabled in t= he > device tree, the default port_map is computed automatically when usin= g > this. Any chance the old one phy config can be moved over to this scheme so that we don't have to carry two separate mechanisms? Thanks. --=20 tejun