Re: [PATCH 29/35] arm: omap: intc: switch over to linear irq domain

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [140730 09:23]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:45:41AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:04:21PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> * Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [140729 09:36]:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >> > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> > > > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [140729 07:18]:
> > >> > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:14:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> > > > > > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [140728 14:19]:
> > >> > > > > > > now that we don't need to support legacy board-files,
> > >> > > > > > > we can completely switch over to a linear irq domain
> > >> > > > > > > and make use of irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips() to
> > >> > > > > > > allocate all generic irq chips for us.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > This patch seems to somehow break off-idle for omap3
> > >> > > > > > where it no longer wakes up.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Sure your bisection is correct ? This patch just switches from legacy
> > >> > > > > irq domain to linear irq domain.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yes, I tried it a few times. Just enabling
> > >> > > > retention idle hangs too with this patch.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Maybe it's omap3_prcm_irq_setup that relies on
> > >> > > > 11 + OMAP_INTC_START? There may be other such issues
> > >> > >
> > >> > > lol.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > OMAP4 has the same nonsense.
> > >> >
> > >> > made me think why (if) OMAP4 works with that same setup. Does wake from
> > >> > OFF work with OMAP4 ?
> > >>
> > >> Not without similar changes, omap4+ has the same issue.. There's a RFC
> > >> series from Nishant to fix some of this, and Tero is moving the PRCM
> > >> into a driver.
> > >>
> > >> > Anyway, here's a quick little hack to check if that's the reason for the
> > >> > regression:
> > >>
> > >> OK yeah that's along the same lines with Nishant's RFC series in thread
> > >> "[RFC PATCH 0/7] ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: minor cleanups and dt support of
> > >> interrupts"
> > >>
> > >> FYI, it did not compile, needs to include linux/of_irq.h. But yes,
> > >
> > > I might have sent the wrong version as I had that same build error and
> > > fixed it localy.
> > >
> > >> it fixes the regression for me, Also now the whole series works for
> > >> me :)
> > >
> > > good to know.
> > >
> > > What do you want to do now ? Wait for PRCM to become a driver ? Wait for
> > > Nishanth's series to get accepted ? I guess the same thing could be done
> > > for OMAP3 and AM33, then we would have a chance of having working wake
> > > from idle with the new irqchip.
> > 
> > I can repost the current series as it stands now once 17-rc1 comes out
> > (without the build failure ofcourse).. if that helps to move it out of
> > RFC status.
> 
> That'd be great. It would be ever greater if you could add support for
> OMAP3 on that too.

Yeah sounds good to me. Tero, does that work OK for your PRCM changes?

Regards,

Tony