From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dmaengine: add a driver for AMBA AXI NBPF DMAC IP cores Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:04:56 +0530 Message-ID: <20140801163456.GZ8181@intel.com> References: <20140725141621.GT8181@intel.com> <20140725163417.GV8181@intel.com> <20140731125704.GV8181@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Shevchenko, Andriy" , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Phil Edworthy , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:42:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Ok. This doesn't seem to progress. You suggested in your previous mail, > that I can provide an incremental patch to add devm_free(_threaded)_irq() > and synchronize_irq() to .release(). I still think, that this doesn't make > much sense, but if you insist... Alternatively, my proposal would be to > fix the thoretical race in .free_chan_resources(). Would you accept such a > patch instead of what you were proposing? I can also convert the driver to > using a tasklet, if required. Would it suffice, if I do those patches as > fixes after -rc1? I'm leaving on a holiday tomorrow and I still have to > finalise some other work, so, preparing those patches today doesn't seem > realistic to me... Would this be acceptable? Can you please send both, incrementally is fine. I will merge them tomorrow -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html