From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:56:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20140804165627.GT3711@ld-irv-0074> References: <1405976886-27807-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1405976886-27807-4-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <20140802083040.GY30282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140802083040.GY30282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Matt Porter , Christian Daudt , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Fong , Florian Fainelli , Marc Carino List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > From: Marc Carino > > > > Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris > > I noticed that you sent this to the patch system. I asked Olof last > night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and > he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.) This means > that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to > take it. OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it? Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route? Brian