From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liviu Dudau Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] PCI: OF: Parse and map the IRQ when adding the PCI device. Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:49:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20140814154959.GG25761@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1407860725-25202-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1407860725-25202-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20140814145804.GA5586@richard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140814145804.GA5586@richard> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wei Yang Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , Tanmay Inamdar , Grant Likely , Sinan Kaya , Jingoo Han , Kukjin Kim , Suravee Suthikulanit , linux-pci , linux-arch , LKML , Device Tree ML , LAKML List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:58:04PM +0100, Wei Yang wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > >Enhance the default implementation of pcibios_add_device() to > >parse and map the IRQ of the device if a DT binding is available. > > > >Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > >Cc: Grant Likely > >Cc: Rob Herring > >Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau > >--- > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > >index 1c8592b..29d1775 100644 > >--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > >+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > >@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > >+#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > >@@ -1453,6 +1454,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcim_pin_device); > > */ > > int __weak pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > >+ dev->irq =3D of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > >+ > > return 0; > > } >=20 > Liviu, >=20 > For this, my suggestion is to add arch dependent function to setup th= e irq > line for pci devices. I can't find an obvious reason this won't work = on other > archs, but maybe this will hurt some of them? Hi Wei, I'm not sure I understand your point. Architectures that support OF wil= l obviously benefit from this common approach, and for the other ones the function = is empty so it will not change existing behaviour. If you are suggesting that I = should create a new API that each architecture could go and implement for sett= ing up the IRQ line then I would agree that it would be nice to have that, but the= question is how many architectures are outside OF that need this? If I understood you correctly, it is a nice idea but slightly outside t= he scope of my current patchset. Best regards, Liviu >=20 > > > >--=20 > >2.0.4 > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci"= in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 > --=20 > Richard Yang > Help you, Help me >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" = in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- =C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF