devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Max Eliaser <max.eliaser@intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>Rob
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:48:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140816184838.GA12671@thin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408172039-32513-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 09:53:50AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> The recent publication of the ACPI 5.1 specification [1] adds a reserved name
> for Device Specific Data (_DSD, Section 6.2.5). This mechanism allows for
> passing arbitrary hardware description data to the OS. The exact format of the
> _DSD data is specific to the UUID paired with it [2].   
> 
> An ACPI Device Properties UUID has been defined [3] to provide a format
> compatible with existing device tree schemas. The purpose for this was to allow
> for the reuse of the existing schemas and encourage the development of firmware
> agnostic device drivers.
> 
> This series accomplishes the following (as well as some other dependencies):
> 
>  * Add _DSD support to the ACPI core
>    This simply reads the UUID and the accompanying Package
> 
>  * Add ACPI Device Properties _DSD format support
>    This understands the hierarchical key:value pair structure
>    defined by the Device Properties UUID
> 
>  * Add a unified device properties API with ACPI and OF backends
>    This provides for the firmware agnostic device properties
>    Interface to be used by drivers
> 
>  * Provides 2 example drivers that were previously Device Tree aware that
>    can now be used with either Device Tree or ACPI Device Properties. The
>    both drivers use an arbitrary _HID.
> 
> This has been tested on Minnowboard with relevant parts of the modified
> DSDT at the end of this email.
> 
> This series does not provide for a means to append to a system DSDT. That
> will ultimately be required to make the most effective use of the _DSD
> mechanism. Work is underway on that as a separate effort.
> 
> [1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_5_1release.pdf
> [2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm
> [3] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdf
> 
> Aaron Lu (3):
>   of: Add property_ops callback for devices with of_node
>   gpiolib: add API to get gpio desc and flags
>   Input: gpio_keys_polled - Make use of device property API
> 
> Max Eliaser (1):
>   leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property API
> 
> Mika Westerberg (4):
>   ACPI: Add support for device specific properties
>   ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties
>   mfd: Add ACPI support
>   gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks
> 
> Rafael J. Wysocki (1):
>   Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware

One issue I noticed with the series: the new read functions, when given
an integer type, don't appear to do any range-checking to make sure the
returned value falls within the range of that type.  They should do so,
and return -EOVERFLOW if so.  And the documentation of the new functions
should note that explicitly as an error case.

With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-16 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-16  6:53 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] ACPI: Add support for device specific properties Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI " Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] of: Add property_ops callback for devices with of_node Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2014-08-20 15:54   ` Lee Jones
2014-08-21  9:05     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] gpiolib: add API to get gpio desc and flags Mika Westerberg
2014-08-18 16:24   ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-08-19  8:56     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-08-19  9:02       ` Aaron Lu
2014-08-19 17:16       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks Mika Westerberg
2014-08-29  6:36   ` Linus Walleij
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] Input: gpio_keys_polled - Make use of device property API Mika Westerberg
2014-08-18 17:55   ` Jacob Pan
2014-08-19  9:27     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-08-19 15:21       ` Darren Hart
2014-08-16  6:53 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] leds: leds-gpio: " Mika Westerberg
2014-08-16 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Darren Hart
2014-08-17 14:11   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-08-17 16:52     ` Darren Hart
2014-08-16 18:48 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2014-08-17  6:55 ` Mika Westerberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-17  6:04 Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140816184838.GA12671@thin \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=max.eliaser@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).