From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: shmobile: r8a7740: document MSTP clock
 support
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 20:11:52 +0900
Message-ID: <20140823111151.GA27759@verge.net.au>
References: <1407507792-8121-1-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>
 <1407507792-8121-2-git-send-email-ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>
 <20140811011214.GI26570@verge.net.au>
 <20140822010400.GC2783@verge.net.au>
 <CAMuHMdXxgYYyZz_M2975W-bPv6EEsoXp6r8QxfrvgP-Ya4q13w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140822084657.GF18670@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140822084657.GF18670@verge.net.au>
Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:46:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:12:14AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 04:23:08PM +0200, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > >>
> > >> Mike, could you consider taking this?
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if you could take moment to consider this patch.
> > > It is a dependency for enabling ccf and in turn multiplatform on
> > > the r8a7740 SoC.
> > 
> > Sidenote: as this patch only updates the documentation, and the driver
> > won't use the newly added value (for now), there's no hard dependency.
> > Furthermore, adding this value is done following the spirit of the existing
> > values, and thus I think you can just continue going forward with the parts
> > that fall under the shmobile jurisdiction.
> 
> Hi Geert,
> 
> I had a conversation with Magnus earlier today and I believe that
> all three of us are (now) in agreement on the point you have made above.
> 
> I'd like to allow myself the weekend to think about this and
> if no issues have surfaced by then I plan to take the remaining
> patches of this series into the next branch of the renesas tree.

I have now queued up patches 2 - 5.