From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SolidRun Hummingboard/Cubox-i DT updates Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:29:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20140825062930.GA6928@dragon> References: <20140823091058.GO30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140823091058.GO30401-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:10:58AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Here's a set of patches updating the Cubox-i/Hummingboard DT files. > > The first two are fairly important fixes, so should at least go in > for -rc kernels. > > The SPDIF patch is something which could go in -rc as well as it's a > cosmetic patch, changing the name displayed in (eg) pulseaudio for the > SPDIF output from the developer-centric "imx-spdif" to "Integrated SPDIF". I will sent the first 3 for -rc. But I second Iain's comment that the first patch should have a better commit log to explain why it's an important fix. > > Patch 4 updates the Hummingboard support as SolidRun now have a Dual > version of this platform, which needs imx6q.dtsi instead of imx6dl.dtsi, > and also has mSATA support. Though it's mostly just a DTS split, the diff stat looks too scary to be a material of -rc. > > Patch 5 adds the mSATA support for the Dual version of the Hummingboard. > > Patch 6 is the first patch which breaks something on the initial version > of the Hummingboard, aka Carrier1, specifically the IrDA receiver. In > hindsight, we should not have used the name "Hummingboard" for the > Carrier1. The Carrier1 is obsolete, and people are being encouraged to > dispose of the C1 hardware. > > Out of these, I think it would be worth getting the first five patches > in for 3.17 (even though we're in -rc), but patch 6 should certainly > wait for the next merge window. Patches 4 ~ 6 are not fixes in any way, so I prefer to queue them for the next merge window. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html