From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] arm64: exynos7: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos7 (SoC) support Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:05:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20140828040517.GF4972@localhost> References: <1409132660-1898-1-git-send-email-ch.naveen@samsung.com> <1409132660-1898-5-git-send-email-ch.naveen@samsung.com> <20140827110927.GC7773@leverpostej> <20140827145021.GC13850@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140827145021.GC13850@arm.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Mark Rutland , Naveen Krishna Chatradhi , "naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "cpgs@samsung.com" , Alim Akhtar , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > > > + select HAVE_SMP > > > > I may have missed something, but I didn't see any SMP support in this > > series. > > We don't even have HAVE_SMP defined for arm64 (just SMP, which is on in > defconfig). > > In theory we don't need any specific SMP support for a new SoC as long > as it uses a standard booting protocol (e.g. PSCI). But for whatever > reason, I only received about four patches in this series, so can't see > the rest. Seems like about 9 of them made it to the list for me. -Olof