From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Inha Song Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] mfd: arizona: Add support for INn_Modec register control Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:42:27 +0900 Message-ID: <20140829174227.4734992c@songinha-Samsung-DeskTop-System> References: <20140818200003.2ab8aca0@songinha-Samsung-DeskTop-System> <20140828113651.GN24579@lee--X1> <20140829170230.673ca9ff@songinha-Samsung-DeskTop-System> <20140829081741.GD24579@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20140829081741.GD24579@lee--X1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: broonie@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:17:41 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Inha Song wrote: > > > Hi, Lee > > Thanks for your review. > > > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:36:51 +0100 > > Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Inha Song wrote: > > > > > > > Some boards need to set the INn_MODE[1:0] register to change > > > > the input signal patch. This wlf,inmode property is optional. > > > > If present, values must be specified less than or equal to > > > > the number of input singals. If values less than the number > > > > of input signals, elements that has not been specifed are set > > > > to 0 by default. > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > - wlf,inmode = <2 0 2>; /* IN1, IN3 use DMIC */ > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Inha Song > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 8 +++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > > > > index 10a0cb9..81e6db8 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > > > > @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arizona_of_get_named_gpio); > > > > static int arizona_of_get_core_pdata(struct arizona *arizona) > > > > { > > > > struct arizona_pdata *pdata = &arizona->pdata; > > > > - int ret, i; > > > > + int ret, i, proplen; > > > > > > > > pdata->reset = arizona_of_get_named_gpio(arizona, "wlf,reset", true); > > > > > > > > @@ -560,6 +560,12 @@ static int arizona_of_get_core_pdata(struct arizona *arizona) > > > > ret); > > > > } > > > > > > > > + proplen = of_property_count_u32_elems(arizona->dev->of_node, > > > > + "wlf,inmode"); > > > > + if (proplen > 0 && proplen <= ARRAY_SIZE(arizona->pdata.inmode)) > > > > + of_property_read_u32_array(arizona->dev->of_node, "wlf,inmode", > > > > + arizona->pdata.inmode, proplen); > > > > > > of_property_for_each_u32()? > > > > Is it more clear to use of_property_for_each_u32() instead of > > of_property_read_u32_array()? > > It prevents you from having to use of_property_count_u32_elems() first. OK, I will fix this. Thanks. Best regards, Inha Song.