From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolin Chen Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of 'big-endian-data'. Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:18:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20140829191803.GA7756@Asurada> References: <20140829110601.GB21473@leverpostej> <20140829115943.GV29327@sirena.org.uk> <20140829164010.GA5520@Asurada> <20140829172601.GC18555@leverpostej> <20140829174019.GA5536@Asurada> <20140829191141.GA29327@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140829191141.GA29327@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Xiubo Li , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:11:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:20AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > Agreed, it's better to be described in the commit comments as well. > > > And regarding the compatibility with the old DT, I personally prefer > > it to be added in the change for safety but if this case is allowable > > which I'm not so sure about it, I'm fairly okay with the rename. > > If you're happy I can easily add a note, but keeping the old property That will be helpful, thank you :) > would remove all doubt :) I'll wait for either an ack or a respin. Yea, I'm fine with it. Acked. Thanks Nicolin