devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
	Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
	"daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Capella <sebcape@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Antti Miettinen <ananaza@iki.fi>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijv>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:34:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140905153457.GA26306@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140905092120.GG13515@arm.com>

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > This patch should be ready to go too, is it ok if I split the series
> > > > in arm64 arch specific patches (will ask Catalin to pull) and CPUidle ones
> > > > (inclusive of DT bindings and !!this patch!!) and send two separate pull
> > > > requests ?
> > > 
> > > If Daniel/Rafael don't have any objection, I can take the whole series
> > > through the arm64 tree (it seems that patches have been already acked by
> > > Daniel).
> > 
> > Thanks a lot Catalin. Since this one is a brand new CPUidle driver and it
> > follows a different pattern from arm legacy drivers I would like to get
> > Daniel's ack on this patch too before pushing it. For the records I have
> > just added two pr_err to signal driver probing error, ultraminor changes
> > that do not justify a repost.
> > 
> > If Samsung guys do not manifest themselves I would drop patch 8 from
> > the series till it gets tested and its patch dependency queued too.
> 
> The last patch also has a dependency, as you mentioned to Daniel. I think
> we can certainly merge the arm64 parts, and if Daniel doesn't object, then
> we can take the driver stuff too but leaving the exynos bits out (i.e. drop
> the last patch).
> 
> Anyway, if you could repost with the acks you've collected and rearrange it
> so the arm64 patches are first in the series, that would be great.

I can repost it with the acks and rearrange the patches, but for the
pull request I have to know what code can be merged, since there are
some arm64 patches (PSCI and CPUidle arm64 back-end) that are strictly
tied to the arm64 CPUidle driver, so I *have* to know if the arm64
CPUidle driver (this patch) can get merged and that requires an ack.

If I do not hear from Samsung guys I will drop patch 8.

I will wait till Monday (ie -rc4) and repost, I hope that's acceptable.

Thank you !
Lorenzo


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-05 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-01 15:28 [PATCH v8 0/8] ARM generic idle states Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] arm64: kernel: refactor the CPU suspend API for retention states Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found] ` <1409585324-3678-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-01 15:28   ` [PATCH v8 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] drivers: cpuidle: implement DT based idle states infrastructure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 13:25   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-03 17:30     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] arm64: kernel: introduce cpu_init_idle CPU operation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 17:34   ` Lina Iyer
2014-09-03 17:46     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 19:16       ` Lina Iyer
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] arm64: add PSCI CPU_SUSPEND based cpu_suspend support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] drivers: cpuidle: CPU idle ARM64 driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 17:37   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-04 16:03     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-04 17:29       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-05  9:21         ` Will Deacon
2014-09-05 15:34           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2014-09-11  8:28             ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-11  8:57               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found]                 ` <20140911085727.GA25773-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-11  9:32                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-12 10:32                     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-12 11:26                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-23 13:35                         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-09-23 18:14                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-14 16:59                 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-23 13:42                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-09-23 18:16                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-29 11:08                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] drivers: cpuidle: initialize big.LITTLE driver through DT Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 13:29   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] drivers: cpuidle: initialize Exynos " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-03 13:32   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-03 17:29     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140905153457.GA26306@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ananaza@iki.fi \
    --cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=k.chander@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=sebcape@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).