From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip-max98090: add driver for rockchip board with max98090 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:42:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20140912134234.GS7960@sirena.org.uk> References: <1410506806-15327-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CRjAHycgiaTQGSqU" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1410506806-15327-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jianqun Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, heiko@sntech.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, grant.likely@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, cf@rock-chips.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --CRjAHycgiaTQGSqU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Jianqun wrote: > This patch to add driver for rockchip board using a max98090. >=20 > Tested on RK3288 using a max98090. This appears to have two slightly different copies of the patches threaded to it... that's a bit confusing. --CRjAHycgiaTQGSqU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUEvhFAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQJOoH/2G9+GShmgP08ravDGbJl1QF tdhg96begUO07R12cQJVQThw5Rcisx7NzA0686gEzTPcgnsWhDURkzMMwRoeLO0K oonyK/8IhJ9dpEMrjEVSvykoepcSjnebjw4/4puP2RcRAVLLw77e2ZdbWUIM7I5/ OzlPIkRta09tw9x+oEEcXDasH6+Dubg0Jcnb8NSEd756HfKAu4gDtHdS64xO9YlG ODazFLcEC+7ANetFOH0Rff/NY/FpN51DORXayX1FrRNpe5GRsgcqMxZs+yzHVtp7 XfqmzPXtC3zGRQElIKfjbJQO0rV9Q2XIEyg38rqO9/LaqRULaqtdR+/9dUj41o0= =k5YQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CRjAHycgiaTQGSqU--