From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris BREZILLON Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] drm: add Atmel HLCDC Display Controller support Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:24:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20140923092436.12b1f2c4@bbrezillon> References: <1410165822-16868-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1410165822-16868-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140922211811.11279ff0@bbrezillon> <20140923063232.GG30514@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140923063232.GG30514@ulmo> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , Andrew Victor , Laurent Pinchart , Bo Shen , Ludovic Desroches , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Thierry, On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:32:33 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:18:11PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:43:36 +0200 Boris BREZILLON wrote: > [...] > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Kconfig > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..6d0d785 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/Kconfig > > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > > > +config DRM_ATMEL_HLCDC > > > + tristate "DRM Support for ATMEL HLCDC Display Controller" > > > + depends on DRM && OF && MFD_ATMEL_HLCDC && COMMON_CLK > > > > I forgot to remove MFD_ATMEL_HLCDC dependency which is now selected... > > > > > > > + select DRM_GEM_CMA_HELPER > > > + select DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > + select DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > + select DRM_KMS_CMA_HELPER > > > + select DRM_PANEL > > > + select MFD_ATMEL_HLCDC > > > > here. > > Maybe this was discussed earlier, but can you remind me why this was > done? The changelog says it was to "simplify", but there's been some > recent discussion that select should never be used for symbols that > are user-visible because that can lead to issues. > > What were the problems having this as "depends on"? I had several people complaining about the complexity introduced by this dependency scheme: if one wants to select the HLCDC KMS driver, he has to select the HLCDC MFD driver first, which is kind of tricky. The MFD_ATMEL_HLCDC symbol is now hidden (see patch 1) which should solve part of the issue. Now that I have your attention :-), could you review this series [1] ? The HLCDC KMS depends on those changes (which you and Laurent suggested). Best Regards, Boris [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/22/300 -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com