From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter De Schrijver Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce of_match_machine() helper Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:44:39 +0300 Message-ID: <20140924074439.GA25537@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1407452515-2390-1-git-send-email-ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> <53FB7642.1000808@wwwdotorg.org> <20140919131245.GQ26779@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919131245.GQ26779@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Tuomas Tynkkynen , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Lorenzo Pieralisi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 04:12:45PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 07:45:38PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 08/07/2014 05:01 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > > > Some mach-specific drivers that don't require their own node in the device tree > > > (for example drivers/soc/*, cpufreq, cpuidle etc.) want to match on the device > > > tree root compatible property instead. Instead of open-coding (and forgetting > > > to call of_node_put on the root node) everywhere, add a helper to the OF core. > > > > Tuomas, I assume there will be a new version of this series to address > > the review comments? For now, I'm not intending on applying this. > > Given that Tuomas's internship ended, I'm willing to push this patch set > forward, if there is interest. So are people still interested in this idea > or should we drop it? Seems there's no interest. I won't bother with this then. Cheers, Peter.