From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties
 support
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:45:01 +0300
Message-ID: <20140924094501.GY1786@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <1410868367-11056-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <1582936.0FiE8Cvqie@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20140924083418.GH17801@lee--X1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140924083418.GH17801@lee--X1>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:34:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> I'd prefer to take the MFD patch through the MFD tree if that's
> possible.  Are there any technical reasons why this would prove
> difficult?

I don't see any reasons why it cannot be taken via MFD tree.