From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:38:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20141002143809.GQ1786@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1410868367-11056-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <15893883.nvuW3ndylz@wuerfel> <20141002133654.GP1786@lahna.fi.intel.com> <3986527.L7rDZAb4g5@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3986527.L7rDZAb4g5@wuerfel> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Lee Jones , Grant Likely , Aaron Lu , Darren Hart List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Is this a limitation in the way that the AML syntax and compiler works, > or is this a decision you made specifically for the _DSD syntax and that > could still be changed if there is an overwhelming interest? It is only limitation of the _DSD device property UUID specification and our implementation. It can be changed if needed.