From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:56:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20141015155642.GG17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <542EBB93.108@gmail.com> <542EC3A3.1060605@gmail.com> <1ACB5318-863E-40D8-8B27-41F1C0D0A4B8@perenite.com> <5432BFB1.2060300@gmail.com> <20141015144259.GB17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> <543E898D.10606@gmail.com> <20141015145539.GB18413@lunn.ch> <20141015153049.GE17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141015153049.GE17447@titan.lakedaemon.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Benoit Masson , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:30:49AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:55:39PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > >Do you have a link to an email thread or the patch Subject line? I can > > > >confirm it's missing from mvebu/fixes... > > > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/275487.html > > > > > > But you and Andrew should check what Arnd suggested. IIRC, there > > > was also an appropriate follow-up patch discussion started by > > > Andrew. > > > > There was a lot of back and forth with Arnd. In the end, he gave up > > arguing because too many voices did not like his solution. So my > > original version stands. > > Yes, this appears to have been a mistake on my part. In the > conversation regarding patch #2 of V2, you said you were going to work > on implementing something and would report back. I applied that to the > whole series instead of just to the second patch. At any rate, applied > to mvebu/fixes now. > > > However, the patch at the end of > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/275528.html > > > > is useful, and it would be nice if it could be merged as well. > > I'll take a look. I'd still like to see that note captured in the binding doc. Did I miss another patch somewhere? thx, Jason.