From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] pmbus: ltc2978: add regulator support Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:24:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20141016212415.GA27469@roeck-us.net> References: <1413399310-19277-1-git-send-email-atull@opensource.altera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1413399310-19277-1-git-send-email-atull@opensource.altera.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: atull@opensource.altera.com Cc: jdelvare@suse.de, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, delicious.quinoa@gmail.com, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, yvanderv@opensource.altera.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:55:06PM -0500, atull@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Alan Tull > > Each output has individual on/off control. > > New in v6: > * Much cleanup of the bindings document > * s/vout_en/vout/g > > Hopefully this is getting closer. We will still have the potential problem of > repeated node names on boards on boards that have many regulators of the same > kind. If this can be handled in the regulator layer, that might be great. > If we handle it here, whatever we come up with will have to keep the same > name over reboots and be predictable enough to serve as regulator node names > in the DT. I'm open for suggestions here. > > This patchset now uses "regulator: of: Provide simplified DT parsing method" > which are in the next-20141014 tag of linux-next. > Hi Alan, Since the problems we have seen are in the regulator core code and not in your patches, I added the series to -next. I fixed up the 'compatible' example in the devicetree description, so there is no need to resubmit the patches. Thanks, Guenter