From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
heiko@sntech.de, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add standard property for poweroff capability
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:53:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023095339.GC6641@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413268273-15151-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com>
[ +CC: Guenter, Lee, linux-pm ]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:31:09AM +0000, Romain Perier wrote:
> Several drivers create their own devicetree property when they register
> poweroff capabilities. This is for example the case for mfd, regulator
> or power drivers which define "vendor,system-power-controller" property.
> This patch adds support for a standard property "poweroff-source"
Shouldn't this property really be called "power-off-source" or even
"power-off-controller"?
The power-off handler call-chain infrastructure is about to be merged
and will be using power[-_ ]off (i.e. not "poweroff") consistently (at
least in its interface).
Furthermore, isn't "controller" as in "power-off-controller" more
appropriate than "source" in this case? We have wake-up sources, which
might appear analogous, but that really isn't the same thing.
I now this has already been merged to the regulator tree, but there's
still still time to fix this.
> which marks the device as able to shutdown the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 6545e7a..27b3ba1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -866,4 +866,15 @@ static inline int of_changeset_update_property(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> /* CONFIG_OF_RESOLVE api */
> extern int of_resolve_phandles(struct device_node *tree);
>
> +/**
> + * of_system_has_poweroff_source - Tells if poweroff-source is found for device_node
> + * @np: Pointer to the given device_node
> + *
> + * return true if present false otherwise
> + */
> +static inline bool of_system_has_poweroff_source(const struct device_node *np)
Why "system_has"? Shouldn't this be of_is_power_off_source (controller)?
> +{
> + return of_property_read_bool(np, "poweroff-source");
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_OF_H */
Thanks,
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-14 6:31 [RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add standard property for poweroff capability Romain Perier
2014-10-14 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] regulator: act8865: Add support to turn off all outputs Romain Perier
2014-10-14 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: Enable power off in pmic for Radxa Rock Romain Perier
2014-10-14 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: Document the standard property "poweroff-source" Romain Perier
2014-10-14 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: Document the property poweroff-source for act8865 regulator Romain Perier
2014-10-15 12:41 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add standard property for poweroff capability Grant Likely
2014-10-15 13:42 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-15 13:56 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-10-15 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-17 6:01 ` PERIER Romain
2014-10-17 6:06 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-10-17 7:23 ` PERIER Romain
2014-10-21 13:29 ` PERIER Romain
2014-10-22 15:59 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-23 9:53 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2014-10-25 7:28 ` Romain Perier
2014-10-25 8:37 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-26 11:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-10-26 14:58 ` Romain Perier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141023095339.GC6641@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).