From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:59:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20141101225953.GF3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1411157684-6991-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <-7443282711873112734@unknownmsgid> <20141003141102.GJ3895@titan.lakedaemon.net> <542EBB93.108@gmail.com> <542EC3A3.1060605@gmail.com> <1ACB5318-863E-40D8-8B27-41F1C0D0A4B8@perenite.com> <5432BFB1.2060300@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Masson Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 02:53:02AM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote: >=20 > Le 6 oct. 2014 =E0 18:13, Sebastian Hesselbarth a =E9crit : >=20 > > On 10/06/2014 01:11 AM, Benoit Masson wrote: > >> Le 3 oct. 2014 =E0 17:41, Sebastian Hesselbarth a =E9crit : > >>> On 10/03/2014 05:29 PM, Benoit Masson wrote: > >>>> Le 3 oct. 2014 =E0 17:06, Sebastian Hesselbarth a =E9crit : > >>>>> On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote: > >>>>>>>> Le 19 sept. 2014 =E0 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth a =E9crit : > >>> [...] > >>>>>>>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I = am not in > >>>>>>>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by f= rom Benoit > >>>>>>>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great. > >>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch fro= m the > >>>>>>> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'= ll be > >>>>>>> able to test during next week. > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> Did you ever get a chance to test this series? > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushe= d the > >>>>> patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on > >>>>> v3.17-rc1 to > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4 > >>>>>=20 > >>> [...] > >> Maybe I missed something ? is this branch you sent me a bare fork > >> from mainline 3.17 ? does it includes the armada XP step A0 patch = ? > >=20 > > Benoit, > >=20 > Hi, > > I prepared more branches with the series > > - on top of v3.17 release: > > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_v3.17 > >=20 > > - on top of next-20141003 (i.e. what will become v3.18-rc1): > > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_next-20= 141003 > >=20 > > It would be great, if you can test in this order: > > - vanilla v3.17 > > - mvebu-ix4_v3.17 > > - mvebu-ix4_next-20141003 > >=20 > All the 3 branch works WHEN APPLYING A0 patch (below), with both my > custom kernel config and the arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v7_defconfig Can I count this as a Tested-by? > The reason why it didn't worked last time was that apparently the A0 > patch (copied) below was not merged into 3.17 :( Yep, sorry. Life got the best of me. The pull request is now sent. > This means that ix4-300d support is broken on 3.17 because of the A0 > stepping patch not merged. Not a problem. It's flagged for stable v3.12 and up. thx, Jason.