* Re: Samsung/S3C6410/Mini6410: how to handle NAND's "clock off"
[not found] ` <20141111184226.GH27002@pengutronix.de>
@ 2014-11-12 9:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-12 12:00 ` Juergen Borleis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2014-11-12 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Borleis
Cc: Kukjin Kim, linux-samsung-soc, Ben Dooks, Brian Norris,
David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel, Grant Likely, Rob Herring,
devicetree
Hello again,
[extending audience a bit]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:42:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the S3C2410 NAND driver [1] can still be used for NANDs attached to an S3C6410
> > SoC. But this driver has a "nice" feature called "clock off" to save some
> > power while not in use. I tried it here on my Mini6410 platform and it freezes
> > the system.
> >
> > The clock tree is somehow:
> >
> > [...]
> > hclk 4 4 133000000 0 0
> > hclk_mfc 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > hclk_mem0 2 2 133000000 0 0
> > mem0_srom 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > mem0_nfcon 1 1 133000000 0 0
> > mem0_onenand0 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > mem0_onenand1 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > mem0_cfcon 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > [...]
> >
> > On the Mini6410 the "mem0_nfcon" clock is the only single user of the
> > "hclk_mem0". And this clock is required to keep the access to the external
> > network device enabled. When the NAND driver disables its clock "mem0_nfcon",
> > the "hclk_mem0" gets also disabled because there is no consumer anymore. The
> > next time the network driver tries to access its device, the SoC freezes.
> Sounds like the network driver should hold a reference to hclk_mem0.
After talking to Jürgen by phone, the solution that the dm9000 driver
should handle the clock sounds wrong. The clk in question is needed by
the SoC to operate the bus the dm9000 is connected to. So I think the
right approach would include
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c6410-mini6410.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c6410-mini6410.dts
index 57e00f9bce99..b5067e631216 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c6410-mini6410.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c6410-mini6410.dts
@@ -55,9 +55,11 @@
srom-cs1@18000000 {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
+ clock-names = "hclk-whatever";
+ clocks = <&no_idea_which_device MEM0_SROM>;
reg = <0x18000000 0x8000000>;
ranges;
ethernet@18000000 {
compatible = "davicom,dm9000";
I don't think the simple bus has clock handling, and I'm not sure if
simple bus is intended to be too simple to handle that. Anyhow, it would
describe the hardware.
The next thing that will pop up once simple-bus (or a dedicated
whatever-bus) has clk-handling is power management. Does the bus notice
when all it's devices are suspended such that the bus driver can turn
off its clock?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung/S3C6410/Mini6410: how to handle NAND's "clock off"
2014-11-12 9:14 ` Samsung/S3C6410/Mini6410: how to handle NAND's "clock off" Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2014-11-12 12:00 ` Juergen Borleis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Borleis @ 2014-11-12 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Juergen Borleis, devicetree,
linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Ben Dooks,
Grant Likely, Brian Norris, David Woodhouse
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 10:14:58 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> [extending audience a bit]
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:42:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the S3C2410 NAND driver [1] can still be used for NANDs attached to an
> > > S3C6410 SoC. But this driver has a "nice" feature called "clock off" to
> > > save some power while not in use. I tried it here on my Mini6410
> > > platform and it freezes the system.
> > >
> > > The clock tree is somehow:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > hclk 4 4 133000000 0 0
> > > hclk_mfc 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > > hclk_mem0 2 2 133000000 0 0
> > > mem0_srom 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > > mem0_nfcon 1 1 133000000 0 0
> > > mem0_onenand0 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > > mem0_onenand1 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > > mem0_cfcon 0 0 133000000 0 0
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > On the Mini6410 the "mem0_nfcon" clock is the only single user of the
> > > "hclk_mem0". And this clock is required to keep the access to the
> > > external network device enabled. When the NAND driver disables its
> > > clock "mem0_nfcon", the "hclk_mem0" gets also disabled because there is
> > > no consumer anymore. The next time the network driver tries to access
> > > its device, the SoC freezes.
> >
> > Sounds like the network driver should hold a reference to hclk_mem0.
>
> After talking to Jürgen by phone, the solution that the dm9000 driver
> should handle the clock sounds wrong. The clk in question is needed by
> the SoC to operate the bus the dm9000 is connected to. So I think the
> right approach would include
I think we need the same here for the S3C6410 SoC, like the imx-weim driver is
for i.MX SoCs.
jbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Borleis |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5128 |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-12 12:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <201411111910.34231.juergen@kreuzholzen.de>
[not found] ` <20141111184226.GH27002@pengutronix.de>
2014-11-12 9:14 ` Samsung/S3C6410/Mini6410: how to handle NAND's "clock off" Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-12 12:00 ` Juergen Borleis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).