From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend] of: Add vendor 2nd prefix for Asahi Kasei Corp Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:51:09 +0900 Message-ID: <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au> References: <5398A53D.3020706@wwwdotorg.org> <20140611190444.GN5099@sirena.org.uk> <5398AB07.4040304@wwwdotorg.org> <87sinbdk44.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <878ulzx6hr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140922130026.GK3290@leverpostej> <20140922132743.GM3290@leverpostej> <87y4rfhmgl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1415845309.4269.6.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1415845309.4269.6.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Mark Rutland , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Olof Johansson , Stephen Warren , Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , ALSA Development Mailing List , Linux-sh list , Magnus , "grant.likely@linaro.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:21:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 02:18 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > > > Still missing is an update for checkpatch to warn when a deprecated > > > > vendor prefix is used. > > > > > > Marking it deprecated and warning with checkpatch is certainly > > > preferable. > > > > I guess removing "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt is very enough > > for warn for a deprecated vendor prefix on checkpatch ? > > Huh? No idea what you mean. > What are you suggesting about checkpatch? Hi Joe, I think that what Morimoto-san wanted to say was something like this: I guess that removing the "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt would be sufficient to cause checkpatch to generate a warning about using the deprecated "ak" vendor prefix. Is that a good approach?