From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] ARM: dts: am33xx: Update DCAN nodes Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:03:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20141113160349.GA1275@katana> References: <1415881371-4982-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1415881371-4982-10-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1415881371-4982-10-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Roger Quadros Cc: tony@atomide.com, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, mugunthanvnm@ti.com, george.cherian@ti.com, balbi@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.comnm@ti.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > Add "raminit-syscon" property to specify the RAMINIT register. > Add clock information. > Rename can nodes from "d_can" to "can" to be compliant > with the ePAPR specs. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi > index 9f3058c..74fefa1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi > @@ -338,20 +338,24 @@ > interrupts =3D <91>; > }; > =20 > - dcan0: d_can@481cc000 { > - compatible =3D "bosch,d_can"; > + dcan0: can@481cc000 { > + compatible =3D "ti,am3352-d_can"; > ti,hwmods =3D "d_can0"; > - reg =3D <0x481cc000 0x2000 > - 0x44e10644 0x4>; > + reg =3D <0x481cc000 0x2000>; > + clocks =3D <&dcan0_fck>; > + clock-names =3D "fck"; > + syscon-raminit =3D <&am33xx_control_module 0x644 0>; Yeah, I missed to write the mail that I disagreed with the "dcan_0/1" compatible-properties of V3. The second parameter to syscon here is much better! Acked-by: Wolfram Sang --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUZNZlAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2pEUP/1mgDo7Nxbw/Cj8EyNr3kMaC 6CEIQFZ2W7TgMGZuGzRd7qpIepHPM5NHiqqsgKOOLyFsuCQUXCE64padMFdcQ28S DQQ7DVbbOAZfPVctZ9wqcyD45HvYxg3DGtg+Dfo0/+zHMKYGgmbwdXMOsS1NRapw aQ2dQemYlsOZN8RX7nLeKo7XbGv+6RgVWxNTtT3pOfW9xKjdD5MGfJVELV3A7SP3 wn1STeoGDoyH9QvL//5Lb+iuAmwRPm4px8YcVQM0b/KgutyFHiOSrQITZVetIcyG czmks5gjyASvSJCoi1V1fQpcT/jm7rkqgateu56vVzLzj789XCj9hjb7qkGvMk8t Me8Rt5EnwSh92zKgksnQm7ztVAmIWq/qaaj1MkrZ8IPb14OZ0ZJ5T1X+7Ow5O3Ua 83xSc/r8FgQEqyVyM4ZvFo6A3HZt17yRwkwnivOy7koeVRp2jLMwxi0zMTLgDdkH IqYxrreSBpqiWKjpJC8D7RLP7yz24zDOIjoEXZwyRfZolJKU32mWkxP8dNSQbups p/w+vU/BrjiAxIVPcnm3h+V9szrPxzJaMveR98lgDB6SDrWsPmSEClyxFiUv332t 0Rkh25gCvAQ+x26Fa8VnGaGDDpmm/4VNjYhiufI6Riho8oxSO0833jFRzioosSNe CcE9e1cfaHrLGEb80KL9 =2YPi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--